“Now you can all see their tactics & how far they will go.”
Double standards still doubling.
“The powerful strength-in-numbers statement…has drawn questions from journalists…”
“You can use these words: manipulative, deceitful, user.”
“I think they should vote their heart.”
“The idea that if you stop talking it goes away has already been disproven.”
“I think he will help us take back the Senate.”
The new Biden standard: “I assure you.”
“The Daily Beast reached out to representatives for Colbert, Kimmel, Meyers and Noah…”
Hitting the road
“He said ‘I want to f**k you.'”
“Frankly, this is a messy moment.”
“It was obvious that this event had a very traumatic effect on (Reade)…”
“Victims must be able to come forward only when they are ready.”
“You should not be running on character for the President of the United States.”
Due process for me, but not for thee?
“That timing conveys a lack of urgency on the part of the NPR politics team.”
“We ought to keep our guard up as this story progresses.”
“Better to just own up to what you are doing: sacrificing Ms. Reade for the good of the many.”
No mo’ Joe?
They are who we thought they were.
“Now feminists are caught in a trap.”
Take it from somebody who knows
“This is consistent with what she told me and others about the complaint.”
WaPo: Dems’ “reexamination of ‘Believe Women'”.
Okay… and how do you plan to do this?
DNC reply: “This is an absurd suggestion on its face.”
“I believe her 100 percent.”
We’re being too hard on Joe Biden?
Blood in the water?
“[Democrats] said ‘Believe Women’ at that time — which is of course crazy and not responsible.”
“I don’t know what else I can say to you!”
“Players, we hear you.”
Will anyone notice? Or care?
More social media virtue-signaling