Hoo boy.
“We found these explanations to be unpersuasive justifications for not acting sooner…”
Weak leak?
Soon.
Puts “data dump” in a whole new light
Double standards.
Is he in or out?
You’re fired.
Oh, really? Do tell…
Intent.
“It makes me mildly nauseous to think that we might’ve had some impact on the election.”
And tell to who?
“Huma has been working hard on her relationship with Anthony.”
“She enjoyed being a celebrity too much.”
Values.
Nothing is constant but the rate of change
Boiling up.
“These emails…are not duplicates of emails found on Secretary Clinton’s private server.”
Scandal.
Hacked by “at least five foreign intelligence agencies”
“I have tried to stay quiet, but Comey has upset me.”
“Additional chances for mischief.”
More pay-to-play?
Secrets.
“He’s in a tough spot.”
Timing.
Politicization.
“metadata on the device suggests there may be thousands sent to or from the private server that the Democratic nominee used…”
Perhaps you could have Bill ask Loretta Lynch during their next private chat
No way out.
Few choices, all bad
Strategery.
Whispers and lies
“Haim is right — we should be jamming this all the time”
Say it ain’t so.
“If the reports are true, it’s possibly criminal and it is sick.”
“Weiner used the screen name ‘T Dog.'”
Chaffetz: The FBI needs to look again at obstruction and intent.
“…something obsessive and reckless that drives him to this sort of behavior”
“This would be an intelligent operative’s wet dream…”
Perhaps phones just aren’t for you
Are we really entertaining this question?
“He asked to see hrc thurs and fri thru normal channels. I asked and she said she doesn’t want to commit to anything”
Plus, do Abedin e-mails show pay-for-play?
Trending
Fangs out for Brandenburg?
Deep holes, and not digging.
Plus AP: Why is no one tracking teacher vaccinations?