I don't care for the Groypers--their whole shtick is mocking civilized behavior and discussion and elevating people like Nick Fuentes into leaders of a movement. They are the anti-Kirks--persuasion and understanding are the opposite of their goal, which is creating an identity group to fight the identity groups of the left.
Still, as unpleasant as their shtick is to me, it infuriates me to see the left-wing hoax that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk because he was a Groyper who hated Kirk because he was Center-Right. It is not remotely true, and the people pushing this hoax are despicable.
Rejecting ALL evidence is a must … they’re sticking to the Groyper narrative, as solely their contemporaries cheer.
— Bluesky Libs (@BlueskyLibs) September 14, 2025
Information warfare. pic.twitter.com/zRojplSeoX
Having been caught celebrating Kirk's assassination and witnessing the backlash against them, they are now blaming conservatives in a new way. They have transitions from "Charlie Kirk deserved what he got" to "the left would never do this or celebrate it--the Groypers did it!
The celebration of an assassination by some on the identarian left even as it becomes clearer that the killer was meme-soaked in the Reddit culture of the online far right only serves to clarify how very adjacent these categorizations now are.
— David Baddiel (@Baddiel) September 15, 2025
This accusation is coming from some of the most prominent voices on the left, and magically appeared as a steady drumbeat AFTER the motives of the assassin were laid out for all to see. They know they are lying, but they also know that their audience is eager to have their faith confirmed.
#ShutDowntheDepartmentofEducation
— Erika Kirk 2028 (@ErikaKirk2028) September 14, 2025
We must stop the leftist indoctrination in schools that ultimately led to Charlie Kirk’s assassination!
In a deleted post, Randi Weingarten showed support for a leftist stating that “the right winger who didn’t want Charlie Kirk to speak did… pic.twitter.com/gP9z18oacy
A few of these prominent Democrats have deleted their tweets, as if throwing their chum into the waters of the left and then deleting their post after it has spread far and wide absolves them. But c'mon, man. The Antifa scribblings on the bullet casings and the reference to transgender ideology were known within hours, and the emergence of this narrative two days after the shooting makes clear that it is a coordinated effort.
🇺🇸1 IN 4 AMERICANS THINK CHARLIE KIRK’S KILLER IS A REPUBLICAN - HE ISN’T
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) September 15, 2025
A new YouGov poll shows 24% of Americans believe Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, is a Republican - more than the 21% who think he is a Democrat.
It follows a coordinated… https://t.co/PVNvDzVp26 pic.twitter.com/voElah1Hd4
A new YouGov poll shows 24% of Americans believe Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, is a Republican - more than the 21% who think he is a Democrat.
It follows a coordinated media narrative across platforms like Facebook, Reddit - echoed by Reuters, and the New York Times - pushing the idea that Robinson was a right-wing follower of Nick Fuentes.
The audience isn't the mainstream so much as the far left--it stokes them up. And, of course, it muddies the water a bit. It is in the genre of the claim that 94% of political violence is Right-wing, which is obviously false. I asked two liberals to name four recent incidents of Right-wing violence in recent years, and they came up with one or two. I can name 5 left-wing murders from just the past year or so off the top of my head. So can you.
One would think after the highest profile political assassination in decades, network and published media would go out of their way to correct disinformation.
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) September 14, 2025
And they aren't. So now the question is, why aren't they? https://t.co/AijI0VKOcD
And then there is the celebration of rioting, the valorization of Luigi Mangione, and the outpouring of celebrations at Kir's death. For a group of people who accuse us of violent tendencies, they sure embrace it regularly.
My Lieutenant Governor--in her official capacity--endorsed violent threats against opponents of sterilizing and mutilating children. Liberal politicians, who spend an inordinate amount of time endorsing violence when they rile up their base, are shedding fake tears when their followers take potshots at Trump and murder a man who literally just held conversations with high school and college kids.
You literally told your supporters that they are fighting a war to save the country and to do whatever is necessary to win that war. Now when there is blowback because one of your kind took your advice, you want to put your supporters in even more fear. pic.twitter.com/ngq0u7DL66
— Helvidius Priscus ⚖️ 🦈 (@HelvidiusPrisc) September 14, 2025
They see the backlash--Charlie Kirk broke through to the public consciousness--and they need a fall guy. So they point fingers at the Groypers.
Watch this flashback supercut of Democrats preaching violence & “civil war” to understand that what happened to Charlie Kirk is what they wanted pic.twitter.com/ns2uHskOMK
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 11, 2025
This is who the elected leaders of the Democratic Party are in their own words. SUPERCUT.
— Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) September 14, 2025
I call out my side every single day. If you are not ready to call this out, to fight back against it and demand better from the people you vote for you have no business saying anything… pic.twitter.com/jSIFrrnfwo
It is not true that all political violence comes from the left, of course. The people who go to such extremes are unhinged, and being unhinged is prior to ideology.
Groypers, Christian Nationalists, and the Online Extremism Few Americans Understand | Column by @colbyhall https://t.co/Bb7uBb1Ydv
— Mediaite (@Mediaite) September 15, 2025
What IS unique to the left is their celebration and egging on of that violence, and how socially acceptable it is to promote it. Doctors, lawyers, professors, and judges wouldn't be spouting off about how much Kirk deserved to be killed unless they were confident it would be seen as socially acceptable.
It's the Doctors, Lawyers, Teachers, and Academics Who Scare Me https://t.co/MjrhEVF1uq
— David Strom (@DavidStrom) September 15, 2025
Luigi Mangione's assassination of a health care executive was clarifying for some people--not because Mangione murdered somebody and was left-wing, but because the left wing embraced his action and called him a moral man.
Hey @THR and @JamesHibberd, there is a quote in this article supposedly from me. It’s completely fabricated. As in, you came up with it out of thin air. I don’t even agree with the quote.
— Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) September 15, 2025
It would be a good idea to retract and apologize right about now. https://t.co/2kDYPCVBDd
They are dissociating themselves and pointing fingers because Kirk's murder is far more clarifying--they see their colleagues and friends celebrating, and it disgusts them. The Democrats have seen the backlash and their response is to generate a new hoax about Right-wingers doing the deed.
This won't work except with the truly committed fellow travelers, for which we can be grateful.
Editor’s Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its globalist agenda.
Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. Join Hot Air VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
