Thumb on the scale
An e-mail scandal Democrats might care about?
Blaming others for your own downfall
“It was so condescending.”
“Nobody cares what Donna Brazile has said in a book. Nobody.”
“Debbie went along with all this because she liked the power and perks of being a chair but not the responsibilities.”
Donna Brazile is looking out for Donna Brazile
“Perez isn’t tied to this. Why is he defending this?”
“Where is our Justice Department?”
“This was a laundering operation.”
“I think it was.”
Captain Louis Renault, or Sgt. Schultz?
“We’re repairing a plane at 20,000 feet.”
“That was the Russian version”
“…it was just another smear campaign by WikiLeaks”
Good for the goose but the gander is a hypocrite
And honestly, how much worse could he be?
Why is she still being interviewed? And running the DNC?
Liar, liar, pants suit on fire
A man for the times
“Why should we trust you as chair to lead us through this?”
“My conscience, as an activist, as a strategist, my conscience is very clear.”
“No device was recovered.”
Dirty deeds, but probably not by CNN
So when will it hurt Hillary?
Apparently nobody in the Democratic Party has a problem with cheating
“One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow…”
The proof is in, and Donna Brazile is lying
“I condemn it in no uncertain terms, it’s awful.”
“From time to time I get the questions in advance”
The new broom sweeps clean, except it’s the same as the old broom
He’s only just begun.
Good enough, smart enough
Double standards – but not the one claimed.
In defense of nonsense
“She’s absolutely tone deaf on this.”
Sentencing still set for Thursday.
The Bloomberg way?
American horror story