Witness for the prosecution?
Interesting way to put it
In vino veritas
A “passive reaction”?
Spicer: How do you credit a book you know is partially made up?
Lied? “I don’t think so.”
“They won’t touch him.”
Who’da thunk it?
Look this way!
“Dozens of people spontaneously combust each year. It’s just not really widely reported.”
He’s just not that into you
Why try to hide it?
Kicking him when he’s down.
“I don’t know why everybody is going along with this.”
“The president has made it clear what his position is.”
“This time it does seem more real.”
Dad Language and real threats.
“Obviously, we’d be honored …”
Hiding in plain sight.
“If the President puts Russian salad dressing on his salad tonight, somehow that’s a Russian connection.”
International man of … incidents?
Believe it or not, the six-minute showdown below with Jon Karl and Jim Acosta is an abridged version. The full …
“In all seriousness …”
“Such a great country that allows you to be here like this.”
FBI already on it.
“A full budget would contain the entire spectrum of the president’s proposed policy changes.”
Paul: Maybe we should wait for a law to be broken first.
“…wrong, wrong, wrong, clearly over the line, unacceptable.”
We should care more about the backlog of openings at State.
I’m just going to admit it… I laughed through the whole thing
“would likely cause severe and irreparable harm to a wide variety of non-parties, including those implicated in the conduct…”
Dan Rather blames Twitter.