“They weren’t involved with us!”
“It’s my personal belief that it isn’t all that effective.”
Russia links didn’t pan out?
“I would be very careful if I were President Trump here.”
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Unless it’s digital, of course
“What is known, however, is that the election was close…”
“Now this is in the arena of law enforcement investigation, it’s going to be very apparent to everyone.”
But on whom?
“This is a big scandal and a reason for an acute international crisis.”
Admirable in theory, but…
“…the Russian produced unverified and possibly fabricated information involving Mr. Trump”
What are the states waiting for?
“I was speechless and angry in October 2010 when CFIUS approved the Uranium One sale to Rosatom.”
“[Schiff] was pretty serious. He wrote all what we said on the paper. Remembered all the details.”
Never talked to Donald Trump?
Embarrassment — but for whom?
“…no conclusions have been reached on the key question of Trump and collusion”
NYT: New target?
Explosive, or a dud?
Wonderful thing, subpoenas.
Also: The Russians are birthing, the Russians are birthing.
2012’s calling, Senator, with the precedent you missed.
It’s probably not who you think
Er … why?
“we did so without informing him whom we were working for…”
“It would be a tragedy if the report has a minority section…”
Couldn’t they have found a stool pigeon with a name that’s easier to spell?
“this Crooked Hillary pile of garbage…”
An embezzler or the “Russian Paris Hilton” may be the choices
“I’m saying this figuratively.”