The Good Law Project Fundraises Off Jason Arday

AP Photo/Peter Dejong

Last week Cambridge University announced a two-part investigation of Jason Arday's death. As I pointed out here, a group called the Good Law Project seems to be driving a lot of this. They not only demanded an investigation, they've also demanded the resignation of the Vice-Chancellor who they believed turned her back on Arday before his death. You can find samples of some of their demands related to the Arday case at the link above.

Advertisement

About three weeks ago, a retired barrister (a trial lawyer) in London named Barbara Rich noticed that the Good Law Project seemed to be fundraising off the Arday case. The person behind the Good Law Project, whose name is Jolyon Maugham, was asked about this during an interview with the BBC and he became outraged and denied it.

Someone informed Rich that she'd been attacked on air and she went to have a look. Here was her response.

She then provided the receipts, showing that GLP has indeed had "Donate" buttons all over the pages for their posts about Arday.

However, someone at GLP must have decided the donate links were a problem because they suddenly disappeared about the time the interview above took place.

Advertisement

All of this got enough attention that the Telegraph did a story about it, including Maugham's eventual walk back.

She and Maugham have sparred on X, formerly Twitter, since 2019. Last week, however, the hostilities were stepped up a notch by Maugham, who called Rich a “troll” in “polite white grandmother clothes”, an insult she said “appears to be a trifecta of ageism, sexism and racism”...

On X, Rich had criticised the project’s Arday petition as “high outrage, low effort activism, in both cases enabling the [Good Law Project] to add names and contact details to its database to promote its activities and solicit public donations for them”. Asked by the BBC about Rich’s post, Maugham shot back: “I think it is disgraceful for the BBC to take lies from social media about our fundraising off the back of Jason Arday.” He added, in no uncertain terms, that the Good Law Project had not fundraised in connection with Arday’s death.

This was not quite true. The Arday petition did in fact feature a prominent button soliciting general donations for the Good Law Project, which was quietly deleted following the interview. The BBC issued a correction, and Maugham later published a lengthy statement that included the acknowledgement that “Barbara Rich, a retired barrister with a long history of hostility towards Good Law Project, is right about this narrow point”.

Advertisement

Here's the BBC correction which notes that Maugham lied.

In an interview with Jolyon Maugham from the Good Law Project about their online petition calling for a public inquiry into the media coverage of the Jason Arday story we mentioned an X thread started by former Chancery barrister Barbara Rich which suggested the organisation was fundraising alongside the issue. This was described as “social media lies” by the guest but Ms Rich has pointed out to us that there was a donate button on the petition page at that point which was removed later that day.

And here's the Good Law Project response to the BBC.

I’m afraid the truth is complicated. Although we got the important things right, we also got some things wrong...

However, we did not rebuild our site to remove all general donate asks, or rebuild our pro forma email to remove general donate asks. So people who went to our site and saw the petition page were still being asked (e.g.): “Good Law Project only exists thanks to donations from people across the UK. When we work together we can win together” and shown a donate button.

He then goes on at length about how none of the emails sent out about Arday included a request for money because he asked those be removed.

We have never asked anyone to “support this case” financially or any words to that effect. I can’t recall another occasion in which I have directed Good Law Project to take this action – public fundraising is the lifeblood of the organisation – but I did here.

Advertisement

So his argument is that he wasn't specifically fundraising off this case but there were still Donate buttons everywhere you looked and he was still collecting contact info that could be used for solicitations later on. The bottom line is that his statements during the interview weren't completely accurate.

I have apologised to the journalist (above) for misleading them. And it is right that I acknowledge that Barbara Rich, a retired barrister with a long history of hostility towards Good Law Project, is right about this narrow point.

Barbara Rich noted there was no apology to her.

In any case, now that he's been forced to apologize, Maugham seems to be over his concern about asking for money in connection with Arday. His Good Law Project just sent out this email including a specific solicitation.

Advertisement

So the thing he was outraged at being accused of doing (fundraising off the Arday case) is something he's now openly doing.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy HotAir's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement