The Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris, just finished off an interesting week to demonstrate that she is indeed ready to go just in case Joe Biden's vigor becomes rigor.
She began her spring offensive tour, and by offensive tour, I mean offending virtually anyone in her path, by checking off another box on the previously unprecedented list by an American Vice President - visiting an abortion clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota.
While there, she spoke to a fawning traveling media corps, and made this pronouncement.
The fact that Harris is militantly pro-abortion comes as no surprise. Coming from California as United States Senator, before that, the Golden State's Attorney General, and before that, Willie Brown's paramour, she has nestled her career in the supportive confines of the abortion industry like a baby would in a uterus. See? I'm okay with the language, too.
A little more than 1.02 million abortions took place within the United States health care system in 2023 alone. That number is up, even after the Supreme Court's dismantling of Roe V. Wade. A million human souls, male and female, that could have grown up to do any number of important things for humanity. Funnily enough, Harris doesn't see it that way, which makes what she said a little later in the week so curious.
The Vice President sat down with ABC News' Rachel Scott, and had this to say about Israel's plan to continue rooting out Hamas battalions in Rafah. Here's what she had to say.
First off, it's ironic that she began her week not caring at all whether there was a path of escape for innocents when those innocents happened to be unborn babies located in a uterus. Again, just demonstrating for the record I'm not afraid of the language. But when we're talking about Palestinians potentially in harm's way not because of Israel, but because of Hamas terrorists using them as human shields, all of a sudden, Harris is a champion for life, so long as it's the right kind of life, apparently. She doesn't take into account, nor is she pressed by Scott, that the latest polling out of Gaza shows that support for Hamas has increased since the war started. So much for the innocence mission.
Second, she's seen the maps, as though to convince all of us that she's a learned professional when it comes to foreign policy. Think she's seen a map of Eagle Pass in Texas? How about Del Rio, Texas? Or maybe even Tucson? We do know she does know something about maps. Here's Kamala Harris mapsplaining Ukraine and Russia to The Morning Hustle radio show from a couple years ago.
Keep in mind, this is a woman who is allegedly part of the brain trust that tried to convince Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last Friday that it was in their best national security interest not to invade Rafah, but instead set up border security between the Gaza Strip and Egypt. In case she hasn't seen maps of this particular area, Israel would have to finish wiping out Hamas everywhere else and re-occupy that entire part of the Gaza Strip in order to fortify the Philadelphi Corridor. There is an unknown amount of miles of tunneling system in that area, and no one has bothered to ask what Egypt President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi thinks about this developing strategy.
Harris is wading into the deep end of the pool without her water wings on, and it didn't get better, even with a creampuff interview given as an in-kind campaign donation by ABC News. Scott asked her about the appropriateness of the Biden/Harris campaign using TikTok, while at the same time being concerned about national security due to the Communist Chinese Party ownership of Bytedance, TikTok's parent company. Harris naturally dodged the question.
We're not banning TikTok, Harris says. Instead, we have concerns, concerns about the national security implications of the parent ownership, and so that's what we need to do in order to address those concerns. Every time Harris opens her mouth, she thinks Zen philosophy comes out, when instead, it can be described more aptly as Penrose Stairs.
Penrose stairs.jpg
Scott does try to press Harris by saying if the bill in Congress, currently sitting in the Senate after an overwhelming bipartisan vote in the House, gets to the President's desk and he keeps his promise by signing it, should the Biden/Harris campaign stay on TikTok, since it's currently owned by the ChiComs?
We'll cross that bridge when we come to it? The decision point with which to cross that bridge or not happened on February 11th. The CCP owns the data right now. They are collecting the data of everyone on the platform, including those going to the Biden/Harris' page, engaging with it, etc. Biden has already said he wants the bill so he can sign it. That means at least intellectually, they've already decided TikTok has to be divested away from the CCP. Therefore, there is no defense or justification for their continued use of it at the present time under CCP ownership, and Harris trying to kick the can down the road doesn't work when they already picked up the can and licked the insides clean over a month ago. She then sticks her rhetorical dismount by climbing another flight of Penrose stairs to return to the same place she started. There's no growth, no development of her answer, nothing you would tend to normally see, say, in a uterus. (Just trying to keep the linguistics on a level to which the Veep can relate.)
Border Czar Kamala had to put on that ill-fitting hat for a bit when confronted with the video of the human stampede we all saw.
Yes, Americans know we have a broken immigration system. Polling also indicates they know Biden and Harris broke it. During the last administration, illegal border crossings didn't look like this, because the Remain In Mexico policy was in force and working, and border wall was in the process of being built. Both elements were destroyed the first week by this administration, and to use a uterine analogy, the border's water broke.
Harris decided to go mine votes, er, visit the fine people of Puerto Rico over the weekend, and that didn't exactly go off as scheduled, either.
Let me set the stage for you. Harris and her entourage went to San Juan as part of the administration's Latino voter outreach. It is unclear whether or not the campaign realizes that Puerto Rico, while able to vote in our elections as a U.S. territory, does not get Electoral College recognition, so technically can't vote for Harris or Biden this November.
At a community center in San Juan, Harris came out to hear a young Puerto Rican man singing to her. Everyone is clapping along with him in the crowd. Harris and her staff clap right along, smiling, encouraging the man to continue in song...until the staffer translated in her head the lyrics the man was singing into English, and bent over and whispered in the ear of the still-clapping Harris.
“We want to know, Kamala, what did you come here for? We want to know,” the man sang, according to multiple translations. “The vice president is here making history. We want to know what she thinks of the colony."
“Long live Free Palestine and Haiti, too.”
It was beyond embarrassing, which is par for the court with this Vice President. She's an embarrassment wherever she goes.
So why spend the entire column on Kamala Harris, you ask? For one reason. Regardless of whom for which you might wish to cast your vote, or specifically not vote for in the 2024 presidential election, one thing is strikingly clear. You may have a lot of reasons why you dislike the former President, and are disinclined to cast a vote for Donald Trump ever again. By doing so, you're reelecting Joe Biden. And here's what that vote for Biden, either directly or passively, will bring you.
You will wake up one day between January 20th, 2025 and January 20th, 2029, and Joe Biden won't. Actuarial tables and your own eyes know this to be true. Joe Biden has less of a chance of surviving the coming term than the in-utero patients of that abortion clinic in Saint Paul Kamala Harris visited last week. You might think a President Kamala Harris would be just as funny in real life as Julia Louis-Dreyfus made politics seem on Veep. But what won't be funny is the conversation you'll have with your grandkids one day, if you're lucky enough to have them escape the uterus, and explain to them that despite all the carnage around them in a dystopian world, at least you remained principles and weren't a party to tolerating mean tweets.
There is, however, a silver lining to a potential Kamala Harris presidency. It won't have this incompetent buffoon out there trying to defend it.
Yes, trying to move books that show graphic illustrations of gay oral sex being performed on minors by minors, that's just exactly like what the Nazis did. Sheesh, the modern day American left has no mooring with reality or sanity anymore.