“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time.”
“…he would receive a unanimous verdict in his favor from those who know him.”
Garland: Thanks, but …
Garland-for-FBI why Democrats lose?
I don’t see how this could possibly fail…
McCaskill: “By the way, Gorsuch was one of the better ones.”
“I doubt he’s going to get 60 votes.”
“If they filibuster this guy, it is because politics has taken over reason…”
“If Obama is indeed in the mood for a final act of defiance toward these vandals…”
“Past is present, and what goes around comes around.”
You don’t have to go home but ya can’t sleep here
Resistance is futile.
Not sticking around?
“Nice try, Mr. President.”
“the Senate won’t be moving forward…”
The book of convenient exceptions
“The Senate will not act on a nominee by Barack Obama.”
Here we go again…
SCOTUS war continues…
Not really, no.
The appearance…maybe but most would probably vote against Garland. Even then, why bother meeting with him?
Shocking, I know
Friend of the NLRB
I’m sure he’ll be fine
He has a record and it should frighten you
“Just man up…”
WaPo: Four Pinocchios for Biden’s “ridiculous” Mandela arrest claim.
“Why are we spotlighting the literacy programs of a brutal dictator…?”
“I grant that the turnouts aren’t at the level that we would hope.”