Candace Owens Got Sued Again Last Week

AP Photo/Dmitri Lovetsky

It's quite a business model Candace Owens seems to have going. She uses her podcast to accuse people of things then (allegedly) refuses to make corrections when corrected. The result is that she keeps getting sued by people. 

Advertisement

Last year it was the Macrons who sued her over her claims that the French First Lady was actually a man. This year there have been two additional lawsuits, one by Charlie Kirk's former head of security, Brian Harpole, and one filed last week by a bystander named Robert Hild Jr.

In order to set the stage, here's a video compilation of some of what Owens has been saying about Hild on her show.

Advertisement

So you get the idea. She's making lots of insinuations that this person who was photographed at the event where Kirk was killed is somehow suspicious. Last week, Hild responded with a defamation claim.

Hild says he had nothing to do with the shooting. But he alleges in a new defamation lawsuit that podcaster Candace Owens has repeatedly told her audience of millions that Hild contributed to Kirk’s assassination, had ties to malicious foreign actors and was connected to a “gothic” and “communist” underground that she associated with the killing...

He and others have asked Owens to retract “the damaging falsehoods” she’s aired, the suit says, but she hasn’t done so. “Hild therefore brings this defamation action against Owens and her companies as the only remaining means of vindicating his reputation,” it says, “and protecting himself from further harm.”

Hild is seeking both compensatory and punitive damages.

The legal complaint against Owens goes into a lot more detail about how she alleged Hild was part of a gothic/communist underground based on a single photo.

Any reasonable person viewing the website containing the photograph of Hild Owen displayed would immediately recognize that the photograph was from a Halloween themed “goth prom” costume party hosted at the Velour Live Music Gallery a local venue in Provo, Utah—even advertising an opportunity to get a temporary tattoo at the event. Nothing on the website even remotely supports Owens’ assertion that Hild was part of a “goth underground.”

The word “underground” never appears on the website. No reasonable person would associate this venue or party as a “gothic underground.” No reasonable person would associate this venue or party as a “communist underground.”

Hild is not and has never been associated with a gothic underground or communist underground. Hild has no communist or socialist sympathies whatsoever.

Owens’ mischaracterization of the event as a “gothic underground” and a “communist underground” when the website plainly shows it was a themed costume and dance party demonstrates Owens’ refusal to consider readily available facts so she could sensationalize the story to increase viewership and generate profit, at Hild’s expense.

Advertisement

Eventually, Owens would name Hild as the person in the photo and would ignore repeated offers by people who knew him to tell her about him. "He’s allegedly, like I said, from Washington State. And no one personally can say, “I know this person.” How could that be? How could that be?" Owens said.

The statement that no one could personally identify Hild was false. C.B. sent a message several days prior indicating she knew Hild. Owens further failed to follow up with Broderick, who would have identified Hild. At least two individuals indicated in the Facebook post containing Episode 245 that they knew Hild. And Boyer also tried to email Owens, explaining that he knew Hild personally.

Owens thus used the false premise that nobody could identify Hild to convey to her audience that Hild is using an alias, that he is not really from Washington State, or and that he did not really attend school in Utah, all to further her narrative that he is a malicious foreign agent.

The whole point of Hild in her drama was for him to be mysterious. By pretending no one had spoken up to identify him she could maintain this ruse. In fact, she had just ignored most of the people who tried to contact her.

There's a lot more in the complaint but the bottom line is that months of insinuations and false claims about Hild had an impact.

In response to Defendants’ call to action for tips, Owens’ fans/followers posted the personal information of Hild and Hild’s family members on social media, including exposing their names and home addresses.

Law enforcement recommended that Hild and his roommates not stay at their homes.

One individual attempted to stalk Hild in person and documented his efforts to expose Hild’s location on social media.

Hild’s home and vehicle were vandalized.

Hild has dated his girlfriend for almost two years, beginning before the events described in this Complaint. Hild wants to marry his girlfriend, but he fears that doing so would expose his girlfriend (whose identity Owens’ and her audience have not yet exposed) to danger and harassment.

Advertisement

I'm not an attorney, but in this case Owens is accused of defamation of a private person, not a public figure. That should make this defamation case much easier to prove in court as the standard is lower for a private individual. All they have to prove is that Owens was negligent, and if the information in the complaint is true then they should be able to show that.

Of course Owens has lots of money for lawyers so this case will likely drag on for months. 

Editor’s Note: The American people overwhelmingly support President Trump’s law and order agenda.

Help us fight back against the Democrats and Soros-backed DAs that refuse to enforce our laws to hold criminals accountable. Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
John Sexton 1:20 PM | October 05, 2026
Advertisement
Advertisement