“WSJ is Fake News!”
“Tensions between Washington and Beijing over news organizations started to escalate last month.”
“You know, we don’t have Obama judges.”
Retribution? More than likely.
“What do you guys think about that? Do you think it would work?”
Plus: Set himself up as a sex symbol?
“These are today’s Democratic norms.”
“I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband and dad.”
An ethical dilemma
“Should I ‘find’ it and tell the team?”
“One 369-word comment supporting the Obama-era net-neutrality rules was posted on the FCC website more than 300,000 times.”
None of you are exactly winning the Miss Congeniality award
WSJ: “Would eschew many of the free-market principles that have guided prior Republican administrations.”
“The presidential stakes are too high for Mr. Trump to let his family business become a daily political target.”
That was certainly convenient, particularly if you happened to be pondering a presidential bid
“there was concern the Iranians probably did consider it a ransom payment…”
“In the future I will be more circumspect.”
“Her fellow Justices need to stage an intervention…”
You might want to take this call
Nothing to see here.
“The Obama crowd too often responds to critics and to world affairs like self-absorbed adolescents.”
“These are profound changes.”
Romney up 2 in gender gap.
Margin of error.
“[T]he numbers in the NBC/WSJ poll bear a striking resemblance to those from 2004…”
“Live Free or Die”
“The last thing they want to do is turn on the television and hear arguments all the time.”
Flip-flopping the days away