And the fact that they will all miss the point
Or totally impossible, actually
Progress, even if incremental
And the story only gets stranger from there
Can they? Perhaps the better question is… should they?
He had a green card and a rap sheet
Children can’t give consent
Some might simply call it “law enforcement”
That’s a crying shame
That’s just lovely
How did you become a judge again?
Your sentence is complete. Now get out of our country.
You realize that harboring is a crime, right?
Can’t hurt to try, I suppose
Take off, hosers
Why? Was your parade harboring criminals?
“Fear is stronger than any wall.”
“we will now look at the number of publishers that are posting articles on Facebook about the same topic…”
“We’ll see what Congress moves forward with.”
Not exactly, but there are some cracks in the wall
“Could you do it?’ I think you could.”
You seem to be missing the point
Breaking the law
Oh, do tell us more
Federal law commands the State Department to stop issuing visas to countries who refuse to take back their criminals. What went wrong?
“I thought that we could work with him and the campaign to move him to the center on immigration.”
“We will break the cycle of amnesty and illegal immigration. There will be no amnesty.”
“I never took him seriously on this.”
“He has said if you want to be here legally, you have to apply to be here legally.”
“We’re going to see what happens once we strengthen up our border.”
“It’s not ‘amnesty.’ It’s ‘comprehensive immigration reform’!!!!”
“[I]f people are anticipating that there would be a deportation corps … that softening means that’s less likely.”
“I think this is a mistake. It sounds like it’s coming from consultants.”
“We want to come up with a really fair, but firm answer.”
“He’s thinking that through.”
What’s that again?
It’s a complete and total fabrication.
No guns for you!