What we need, apparently, is more unfounded accusations.
“…put a bullet in his … skull.”
What could it be?
“Why would I attack her?”
“Even before Brett Kavanaugh’s name had been announced they were already opposing ‘fill-in-the-blank’.”
“This is such nonsense.”
“Christine Blasey Ford has either developed a case of cold feet or she’s playing footsie with the Democrats.”
“That it happened or not, I have no idea.”
“I think this has been a mess from start to finish.”
“I’m going to look at what she said about Brett Kavanaugh in high school and compare that to everything else I know about Brett Kavanaugh…”
Meanwhile, at CNN: “This deserves a correction.”
Demand for FBI probe “reverses the normal order of things.”
“No other OUTSIDE investigation is necessary…”
“I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women.”
Graham: It’s a delay tactic.
Playing the long game
“…it does speak to this notion that perhaps there are portions of his childhood he’d rather not come to light, I suppose.”
“This is a completely false allegation.”
“Guess who’s perpetuating all these kinds of actions?”
“We want her to appear.”
Also: Ford silence “very puzzling.”
Dead heat in MN.
“Odds are it will be a circus.”
Plus: Schumer wants the FBI involved.
Like that could happen, right?
And this isn’t a good thing
“Dr. Ford’s attorney could have approached my office…”
“It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled.”
Conway: “This woman will be heard.”
Not a “politically motivated action?”
A tale of two sittings
Stick to your story
Well, not quite.
Sauce for the goose.
“Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself.”
“It seems kind of icky…”
“Demonstrates the new lows to which the judge’s opponents have stooped.”