“The powerful strength-in-numbers statement…has drawn questions from journalists…”
Say, does anyone remember the media obsession with stare decisis?
The new Biden standard: “I assure you.”
“Frankly, this is a messy moment.”
“Victims must be able to come forward only when they are ready.”
“The Democratic Faustian bargain to destroy Kavanaugh has come full circle.”
They are who we thought they were.
WaPo: Dems’ “reexamination of ‘Believe Women'”.
“Past actions matter. We need another nominee.”
“Kavanaugh was a running, hot story.”
“Come on man, I heard you liked me.”
Get over it.
“Journalistic malpractice,” or “politics as public theater”?
” … a monument to hearsay and a travesty of journalistic ethics.”
Showdown with Nadler coming?
“This is the most radical attack on the judiciary in decades.”
“It’s kind of a team effort, frankly…”
“The guy has a very impressive record.”
“We certainly never intended to mislead in any way …”
Politico: Senior Democrats pulling the plug on impeachment.
“When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is…”
“Defendants had no sources to support their outrageously false and defamatory statements…”
Time to move on
“Really, after this, she probably can’t recover from this.”
“We have…a society that has become very vicious.”
No equivalency with Trump?
“Allegations remain in forefront for Kavanaugh…”
“Having a Supreme Court justice is going to create value for the students.”
A mixed bag of famous and not so famous names.
“For 20 years, I have represented Davids vs. Goliaths and relied on due process and our system of justice.”
He’s a giver!
And also “for everyone’s right to be heard”?
Speaking of “tear-down culture …”
You don’t say
“There’s no question that he committed perjury, right?”
“I think we should listen to everybody.”
Interesting times, indeed