Upping the ante.
“It is on the President to clean it up and fire the people responsible for making it.”
“You’re saying that everything he said is irrelevant?”
“And in awe.”
Travel ban still in place — for now.
“there is simply no evidence that the withdrawal of Chadian forces from Niger had anything to do with the ambush”
Two of these things are not like the others.
“…that part of the decision is stayed pending the receipt of a response from the state of Hawaii.”
No, not really.
Believe it or not, the public doesn’t want to be blown up
It’s more about the powers of the Presidency at this point
It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient
“There is no finding that present vetting standards are inadequate…”
“I’m going to not let [the president] be seen as the perpetrator here.”
“I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!”
“the majority grants itself the power to conduct an extratextual search for evidence suggesting bad faith”
Shouldn’t this be moot by now?
“If there was a new order, or if there’s a new appeal, we will be looking at it…”
Let’s just kick this can up to the Supremes, shall we?
“…the Trump administration’s new order is legal and falls under the president’s power over foreign affairs and national security.”
“…it is no longer likely that plaintiffs can succeed on their claim that the predominate purpose of EO-2 is to discriminate against Muslims”
“I think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way.”
“The hearing in Hawaii came in response to a lawsuit filed by the state itself.”
Second time’s a charm?
They don’t make capitulations like they used to.
Poised to defend the deconstruction of the administrative state?
ACLU vows: We’ll block the new one too.
11-day warning period?
Shouldn’t have been doing that anyway