More fuel for House Dems’ impeachment movement?
“I think it was a set-up. The whole thing was a set-up.”
Follow the money.
“Depends on the stolen material.”
“They never gave up asking, but they had no good answer for that question.”
“My main obligation is to defend somebody, not to deal with philosophy.”
“I said ‘the president of the United States.’”
Giuliani: “I challenge Mueller to put up or shut up.”
“They’re a joke!”
“You have to be sensitive to public optics.”
“A totally illegitimate investigation.”
“The president still hasn’t made a decision.”
“If Democrats get control of the House, do you think they’re going to treat President Trump fairly?”
On Mueller: “He’s bluffing and he’s only got a pair of twos.”
“You put a guy in jail if he’s trying to kill witnesses, not just talking to witnesses.”
“Anything Peter Strzok touched is contaminated …”
“Nor do we care.”
“Explain to me how she could be damaged. I mean, she has no reputation.”
But then he’d need to get out of Dodge
THAT’LL go over well. Also, he can’t do it.
“Eventually the decision here is going to be impeach, not impeach.”
“Informant” the key?
“Don’t know for sure” if an informant in the campaign.
“This case is essentially over.”
“I know the Justice Department better than just about anyone.”
“I think he’s getting sensitive to the fact they’ve gone on a little bit too long.”
“How can I be confident?”
“I have no knowledge of that. But I would think if it was necessary, yes.”
6-9 ET on POTUS 124!
“There is no campaign violation.”
Also: “I would love to speak” with Mueller’s witch-hunting investigators.
Interesting way to look at things.
Promises U.S. strategy is working.