Another endorsement of the heckler’s veto.
The new rules du jour are …
You’re not serious. Oh, wait… you are.
“Free speech is one thing. Hate speech is entirely different.”
The only thing broken is the user base
Hate speech for me, but not for thee
Hate speech apparently means “anything we don’t agree with”
“It looks like we made a mistake…”
Hate speech isn’t a hate crime, but what is this?
“I believe the Mayor was purposefully lying and if he wasn’t lying, he was grotesquely incompetent.”
“the right response is not the heckler’s veto, or what some call platform denial.”
Words are “powerful weapons”
“If the criterion for censorship is that nobody’s feelings can be hurt, we are finished as a free society.”
“…they will be placed in a limited state.”
“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”
“No-platforming may look like censorship from certain angles…”
“There is no denying that problematic opinions need to be addressed…”
Hey, we were just trying to start a conversation
What could possibly go wrong?
“You’ve got to take the hat off or I’m going to write the president of the university.”
Define hate speech
“I think this is fantastic. I absolutely agree.”
“A real and present danger.”
The feint of the fainting couch.
Control is the shared value now.
“She achieved her provocative goal in Garland…”
This is CNN.
Zero likes out of nine
“There’s not 51 votes to dismiss it before the managers get to call the case.”
“significant enough to have shifted the document’s meaning…”
“It is certainly not how the executive, current or in the future, should handle such a call.”