Are Pinocchios the point?
“…it’s difficult to tell from the visual evidence whether the three Democrats sat down earlier than others or did not rise a second time.”
Also: Four Pinocchios for Maxine Waters on “ridiculous” attack on DeVos.
Er … good news?
Four Pinocchios, and a boatload of shame.
Sins of omission.
He never had accurate relations with Comey’s statement, in other words.
“What resulted Friday were still more mischaracterizations.”
Reason provides the Email Scandal Supercut.
“Misstated key facts.”
That’s all, folks!
Women earned 38% less than men …. where?
Plus, two Pinocchios from the WaPo.
Let slip the dogs of bans.
What difference does it make?
“This is clearly a case of winning ugly.”
Missing the Clintonian forest for the trees?
You have an Opinion section. Use it.
Math is hard.
Four Pinocchios on taking credit for climate-change movement.
“The circus is back in town.”
Forest, trees … engage active avoidance.
All the news that’s fit to ignore.
Another one for the Grubes.
Taking him to school(house rock).
“That is literally what he is doing today.”
Did HHS intentionally use Gruber to fake out CBO?
“This ad is beyond the pale.”
Nobody puts Baby Tito in the corner … or Milosevic.
Plus, when is rebroadcasting a public performance?
Plus: Politico notices that ObamaCare stats are worthless.
Any Lies of the Year?
Politifact hardest hit?
New York Times tries to salvage the narrative.
“Ill-considered,” “bungled,” but no lie?
Another Hillary run in 2020?
“Robin Hood was robbing the tax collectors who were collecting too much taxes…”