“the decision to reopen the investigation may not line up with the spin that it was a mop-up exercise…”
“The IG is thought to be looking at everything from political bias to how evidence was handled in the Clinton email case.”
“this is what Trump apologists want us to believe…”
“…told the agents that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ and did not know who did”
Trump attorney: President has “an acute interest in this matter.”
“We’re not messing around.”
“Deafening silence from ACLU and civil libertarians … appalling.”
“We had a full and open discussion about it.”
Fodder for Sessions?
And the chorus of internal opposition grows
“Comey, the report states, recalled that McCabe had denied authorizing FBI officials speak to the Journal…”
“…the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed”
A matter of definitions
DoJ mulling a McCabe prosecution?
“We need to find out the truth, exactly what happened, how it happened, why it happened.”
No cash for you
“…yes, it will be investigated.”
Stop me before I reveal “sources and methods”?
Plus: A Sidney Blumenthal conduit between Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele?
NYT: New target?
“…if we find out you’re not complying with federal law, we’re taking the tax dollars back.”
“a number of high-level FBI officials…were holding secret meetings offsite”
“[M]ay have been used … to so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign…”
“The universal sense of justice has been violated.”
“[C]ertainly on the surface, it doesn’t look good.”
Hat trick or unified-field theory?
Harshing mellows nationwide or re-establishing the rule of law?
“The group hopes to release a report early next year…”
Hair of the dog.
“The precise nature of Mrs. Ohr’s duties – including whether she worked on the dossier – remains unclear…”
Congress off the hook?
So help me God.