“We need to find out the truth, exactly what happened, how it happened, why it happened.”
No cash for you
“…yes, it will be investigated.”
Stop me before I reveal “sources and methods”?
Plus: A Sidney Blumenthal conduit between Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele?
NYT: New target?
“…if we find out you’re not complying with federal law, we’re taking the tax dollars back.”
“a number of high-level FBI officials…were holding secret meetings offsite”
“[M]ay have been used … to so badly surveil and abuse the Trump Campaign…”
“The universal sense of justice has been violated.”
“[C]ertainly on the surface, it doesn’t look good.”
Hat trick or unified-field theory?
Harshing mellows nationwide or re-establishing the rule of law?
“The group hopes to release a report early next year…”
Hair of the dog.
“The precise nature of Mrs. Ohr’s duties – including whether she worked on the dossier – remains unclear…”
Congress off the hook?
So help me God.
“Harvard has pursued a strategy of delay and has not yet produced even a single document.”
Swing and a miss.
“…the demand is discriminative, it contradicts both the democracy and freedom of speech principles.”
Coincidences or crosshairs?
Out of 210?
“Where is our Justice Department?”
Being a sanctuary state doesn’t pay well
“Swampy stink knows no partisan allegiance.”
“It is not every day in congressional investigations that we find a smoking gun.”
And also Uranium One.
Time for a reset?
The terrestrial kind
“Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation…”
It’s not a hate crime. It’s a violent crime.