If that sounds to you like Alberta Premier Danielle Smith jinked when she should have jived, yeah.
It sounds like that to a lot of people.
As you know, if you've read any of my posts over the past year, the question of a referendum being on the Alberta ballot to begin the process of a formal separation from the Canadian confederation has been a long, twisty process. At the moment, the petition to get the independence question on the ballot has been declared pretty much moot thanks to a victory in a lawsuit by the First Nations tribes. They had sued, asserting that the petition drive was unconstitutional to begin with because the government of Aberta allowed it to go forward without checking with the tribes beforehand.
A court agreed with them, first issuing an injunction to prevent the Elections Alberta authority from verifying signatures, and then by declaring the petition and its over 330K signatures illegal, null, and void.
Premier Smith immediately said her government would be appealing the decision because she felt it was 'undemocratic.' Simultaneously, hopes were raised that Smith would simply authorize the independence question to be on that October 19th ballot. She does have the authority to do so.
Everyone was holding their breaths, and Smith actually came through, or so they though at first.
When they had time to do a little parsing of her specific language, it turned out that what the premier actually authorized was a question about allowing a referendum to appear on the October ballot.
Not, like, the real thing.
LIKE, WHUT
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has announced plans for the oil-rich province to hold a non-binding vote in the fall on whether its residents wish to remain a part of Canada — or move ahead with a second binding vote on separation.
The move marks the first time in Canadian history that a province other than Quebec has put the question of separation to the public and comes after months of campaigning from a group of separatists.
Speaking during a televised address on Thursday evening, Alberta’s Smith said she supports the province remaining in Canada and would vote as such in a provincial referendum.
“However, despite my personal support for remaining in Canada, I’m deeply troubled by an erroneous court decision that interferes with the democratic rights of hundreds of thousands of Albertans,” Smith said.
An Alberta judge had previously thrown out a petition seeking for the province to separate from Canada.
Hang on a minute, said independence advocates. That's not how this is supposed to work.
🚨BREAKING NEWS: Danielle Smith has announced Alberta’s independence referendum question:
— Rise Of Alberta (@RiseOfAlberta) May 22, 2026
“Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum… pic.twitter.com/hSY0hPjWB7
...“Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”
This is like getting completely snookered on constitutional amendment language on a state ballot here, which happens all the time.
So there is no independence referendum.
— Kevin in Alberta (@kevin_inalberta) May 22, 2026
Instead our choices are "Stay in Canada," or "Stay in Canada and talk about independence"
And folks aren't falling for the independence referendum in the tailpipe joke.
It's idiocy.
— Tim (@Timsiebs) May 22, 2026
A slap in the face to the 7,000 Albertans who canvassed in the bitterly cold winter, collecting over 300,000 signatures for a referendum on independence.
She not only didn't provide that--she raised the bar so that now independence will have to pass TWO…
...She not only didn't provide that--she raised the bar so that now independence will have to pass TWO referendums!
OH, SILLY RABBIT - INDEPENDENCE TRICKS IS FOR KIDS!
The politicians, to include Smith, seem intent on kicking the can down the road as far as they can. And really, should it be a surprise to anyone?
Probably not. And the more baffling the wording, the better.
The Alberta referendum question is widely considered highly confusing and contradictory because it combines two opposite choices into a single "yes" or "no" answer.
Voters are asked:“Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”
Why it is confusing: Contradictory Choices:
The question forces you to weigh staying in Canada against starting a potentially years-long legal process to eventually leave.
The "Yes" Trap: Voting "yes" agrees to both remaining in Canada and triggering a future referendum on separation, even though these two outcomes conflict.
The "No" Trap: Voting "no" rejects the binding referendum, but it also technically votes against remaining in Canada.
Because of the tangled wording, politicians across the spectrum and political analysts have widely criticized the ballot as baffling and unworkable.
Smith says this is the best she can do right now.
HAD A BINDING LEAVE QUESTION BEEN ON THE BALLOT IT LIKELY WOULD HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN BY THE COURTS WITHIN WEEKS
Danielle Smith goes completely limp on the Alberta referendum, saying it's legally impossible for Alberta to have a referendum. Despite all the work put in to collect the needed signatures.
— Bruce McGonigal (@bruce_mcgonigal) May 22, 2026
From the BC Conservative leadership race to Alberta independence, our democracy is under… pic.twitter.com/BHcHbbGoSZ
...From the BC Conservative leadership race to Alberta independence, our democracy is under extreme attack in Western Canada.
We are being told our rights do not matter. Our voice does not deserve to be heard. Our votes simply do not matter and should only count if the establishment gets the outcome it wants.
You can play by all the rules, only to watch the system change the rules at the last minute. Sickening but par for the course in Canada.
I don't remember the Quebec referendums in 1980 & 1995 being shut down by the courts.
So, there it stands.
Many of the Leave folks are trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, and I get it. They busted ass all winter and did a phenomenal job on the petitions, played by the rules, and had it all thrown back in their faces.
So it will be a summer of door-knocking, rallies, and social media work at twice the pace to chase down the votes they need so they can score their original goal of a referendum...someday.
One step forward, and two back.
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy HotAir's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member