MSNBC has its stable of race-baiting hosts, most famously the unhinged and unwatchable Joy Reid. Tucker did over thirteen minutes on it the other night, focusing on the loathsome Tiffany Cross. He likened her race-baiting to the gasoline that lit the fire of the Rwandan genocide, especially considering the parade of radical racists she has on as guests. They’re all nodding in agreement and adding their own inflammatory sound bites on the persistently evil “WHITE PEOPLE SUCK” and “BLACK REPUBLICANS ARE MORONIC RACE TRAITORS” themes.

Here she is again the other night, speaking to the smirky and equally vile Michael Steele, while misrepresenting him to her audience as a “Republican.” Cross is bemoaning that Republicans of color are merely there to be “faces” of color, vice “voices.” Such a snappy catchphrase, no? I’m assuming that’s because her Leftist-poisoned, fascism-loving midget brain can’t understand a single common-sense, freedom-loving thing we say. But she’s mad about it.

MSNBC host: Republican minorities are “faces of color, not voices of color” and are “not coherent” pic.twitter.com/daULw7RSfL

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) October 24, 2022

There’s no way an intelligent person of color – whatever color that might be – could possibly consider themselves Republican, right? It’s like Stockholm Syndrome or something, or so says noted racist Jemele Hill.

Cutting edge analysis here. 🙄

It can’t be because Democrats have become the party of “Latinx,” open borders, defund the police, lockdowns, and teaching kindergarteners they can choose their gender from limitless options?

Nah… must be “proximity to whiteness” pic.twitter.com/viUUmNi3al

— Christina Pushaw 🐊 🇺🇸 (@ChristinaPushaw) October 24, 2022

Jemele Hill – the same racist ‘journalist’ (I use that term loosely) who found not a single objectionable thing in St. Sen. Raphael Warnock’s entire life, so convinced of her blinkered view’s superiority is she. Only the dumb, pitiful minority creature running as a dupe for Republicans is worthy of criticism and scorn.

…Warnock didn’t generate a single juicy or humiliating headline. Articles about the Democratic incumbent dutifully describe his issue positions and his campaign strategies. Meanwhile, the Daily Beast reported recently that the staunchly anti-abortion challenger had paid for an abortion that the mother of one of his children underwent. That story prompted Walker’s son Christian to post a bitter rebuke of his father on Twitter.

…Some of Walker’s completely unintelligible answers to basic questions would be amusing if the Georgia Senate race weren’t so important. His victory could help tip control of the Senate to Republicans, creating ripple effects across the country—potentially including legislation to ban abortion nationwide.

Walker’s disturbing history in no way reflects on other Black men. But I can’t help sensing some condescension in Republicans’ elevation of such a buffoonish candidate. Does Walker embody what they think Black men really are? Do they think that Black voters in Georgia are so gullible and hungry for representation that they would willingly overlook Walker’s obvious incompetence?

His candidacy is especially offensive in light of who he is running against. Unlike Walker—who has falsely claimed to have graduated in the top 1 percent of his college class, even though he left after his junior year to join the USFL—the incumbent has a real academic record. Warnock graduated cum laude from Morehouse College and earned two master’s degrees and a doctorate from Union Theological Seminary. As the pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, he preaches in the same pulpit that Martin Luther King Jr., preached in. His Senate victory two years ago made him a rising political star. In office, he has astutely focused on bread-and-butter issues and worked with Republicans where possible.

…If Warnock wins, it would be a fitting punishment for Republicans, who are trying to play cynical racial politics by a new set of rules. But the message they’ve sent is that any old Black candidate will do—even one as flawed as Walker.

That one glowing paragraph is it as far as any background on the saintly Rev Warnock goes, running as he is against a GOP “any old Black” man. The campaign to knee-cap and delegitimize Republican minorities as “NOT MINORITY ENOUGH” is busy swinging away, as well as painting all those who would vote for Republicans as…wait for it…threats to democracy.

Taking the Democrat side of "free people choosing to elect Republicans is a threat to Democracy" propaganda talking point is an IQ test. One that most media have failed. https://t.co/H4ULE8dWPt

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) October 24, 2022

And the media jumps on reported incidences of “racist acts/racial hate” just as fast as Jill Biden unclenches her hands when Dementia Joe goes off-script. They can’t wait to shove another purported example of hate-filled WHITE PEOPLE down the collective throats of the audience, and drive them, herd-like, into the ever-lovin’ arms of progressive Democrats.

VOTE BLUE SO THIS DOESN’T HAPPEN TO YOU!

Establishment media propagated another racism hoax

Brigham Young University has found no evidence that a racial slur was yelled at Duke volleyball player Rachel Richardson, meaning establishment media once again jumped on a racial hoax without waiting for evidence.

BYU interviewed 50 eyewitnesses and reviewed “security and raw footage from all camera angles taken by BYUtv of the match.” The university had put four ushers, a police officer, and a Duke assistant athletic director in the student section after Duke’s coach relayed Richardson’s accusation of a slur being used. Richardson said the slurs were louder in the fourth set of the match, yet none of the people placed in the student section heard them, nor did the students or Duke’s players aside from Richardson.

Of course, Richardson didn’t hear them either — because they were never said.

Not so much attention when it – invariable and inevitably – turns out to be yet another JIM CROW, JIM CROW LIE. Shoot. Even when the lie smacks them in the face like a wet washcloth, they still want to squawk “JIM CROW JIM CROW“!!

“It is. It is. Unfortunately it is Jim Crow.” On ABC’s #ThisWeek, @DonnaBrazile doubles down on left wing canard to explain losses. pic.twitter.com/99BsyNc2oU

— Brent Baker 🇺🇦 (@BrentHBaker) October 23, 2022

It’s not a lie when they say it repeatedly. Neat how that works.

But what about the hate and anger and resentment – however unfair, unwarranted, and undeserved – media outlets are fomenting against completely innocent fellow Americans? Stoking divisions purely for election gains based on skin color and demonizing the other party? What happens to those folks caught in the crossfire?

Not their problem. It’s a mission – drive the country to the blue side (One that has them polling lower than dogpoop/Biden on the trustworthy scale, but a mission nonetheless.). In the blind eagerness to have us at each other’s throats, they can’t discern that once everything is racist…nothing is.

And knowing that doesn’t make you the – what did that racist Hill woman say? “Any old Black candidate.”

It makes you the better person in the room.

I hope we blow the doors off these ghouls.