Seriously, not literally.
“You don’t need significant number[s] to commit atrocities.”
“…without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations.”
“With that being said, NATO is very important to me.”
“There was no other reason, and no need to look for an excuse – not Jewish settlements…”
“You just have to stay as calm as you can … I took a bullet.”
“underlines the importance of an increased control over our territory…”
“Berlin seems to be one of only times ISIS has taken credit when attacker still at large.”
“We must get used to the idea that he was possibly not the perpetrator…”
Excited troops await Obama’s report on terrorism
Actually, a lot late.
“It is not possible to ensure zero risk despite everything we are doing.”
What you missed in the last debate.
This must be more of that “public versus private” opinion we’ve been hearing about
You probably shouldn’t be writing to your ISIS friends anyway…
Wife cooperating with investigators?
Wife skipped the country just before the attacks.
None dare call it treason.
On the crawl?
“When it comes to ISIL, we are in a fight, a narrative fight with them, a narrative battle…”
“We’re trying to get to the bottom of his motivations.”
I used to think the world changed that day. Actually, I did.
“I have to get smarter.”
Relaunching the Taliban’s brand
“Trump should spend more time talking about America and less time talking about Trump.”
IDF: You mean Munich II – Iranian Boogaloo?
No propaganda on computer, though
Calmer than you are.
Why France again?
“your existence is a disturbance.”
“…they began pursuing some men on motorcycles, who lured them into a complex ambush.”