“There’s definitely been deterioration in the last year. She’s in a very different mode now.”
“Congress remains suck…” [sic]
“If he feels threatened by that conversation, he’s got a problem.”
The Otter strategy strikes again.
“… sexist & ageist motivations against an outstanding legislator & icon in her own right”?
Lemons, lemonade, some dissembling required.
“This is gonna be a long, contentious week.”
“This nominee says she wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act.”
Games people play.
“But courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life.”
Wallace: “So why can’t you question Judge Barrett virtually?”
Who’s Zooming who?
Nice try, DiFi.
“We don’t need to open that up for whatever length of time, so that whoever this nominee is can be Kavanaugh’d, or Borked, or Thomas’d.”
“This is now a linchpin issue of this election.”
Turley: No really, where’s the media on this?
“Yelling at me is not going to solve the problem.”
“Given the House of Representatives’ behavior …”
“This is a mess.”
“I had more to do with the Mueller report than probably he did.”
“Frankly surprised” at punt on obstruction.
Schumer, Pelosi insist Mueller testify before Congress to “restore public trust.”
Speaking of “tear-down culture …”
“I think he’s held up well.”
“I don’t believe Mr. Mueller would be involved in a witch hunt.”
GOP, Dems tell each other: Clean up your act!
Rosenstein out soon?
“No American should be told that his or her public service is unwelcome because ‘the dogma lives loudly within you’ …”
I wonder why
Subornation of perjury?
“I think that’s tragic. I think that needs to be looked into.”
Grassley to FBI: Go get the false claimants.
Also, the Senate’s nadir: Please explain “ralph,” “boof,” and your high-school yearbook.
“I believe that the constitution’s provisions of fairness and due process apply here as well.”
Two victims, no winners.
48 hard votes to confirm?
Into the fire
“You’re right to be angry.”
“we will explore lawful pathways for them to remain in the United States”