Update, 11:00 am ET: It’s tough to make a case against Barr on the basis of Mueller with responses like these:
Sen. Feinstein: Will you commit to providing Mr. Mueller with the resources, funds and time needed to complete his investigation?
Barr: Yes.
Feinstein: Will you commit to ensuring the special counsel Mueller is not terminated without good cause?
Barr: Absolutely. pic.twitter.com/dTzviy6zDJ
— POLITICO (@politico) January 15, 2019
That’s about as contentious as it’s gotten in this opening round … so far, of course.
Original post follows …
To kick off the highest profile hearing since Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, two Lindsey Grahams showed up to lead the (non-?)circus. If you like “immigration Lindsey Graham,” the new chair promised Democrats, you’ll see him. No one much liked the “other” Lindsey, he acknowledged, not even himself — but Graham suggested that Democrats will see him too if they don’t approach Attorney General nominee William Barr with respect.
Sun’s getting real low, big guy …
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham on Attorney General nominee William Barr: "I want to thank the president for nominating somebody who is worthy of the job…and can right the ship over there." https://t.co/yecHCTvrG5 pic.twitter.com/ZFBrB9HTgB
— ABC News (@ABC) January 15, 2019
Barr then opened with a statement in which he claimed reluctance to take the job at all. At 68, the next step he and his wife wanted to take was retirement, Barr told the panel, not to return to a job he’d already done once. After suggesting other candidates, Barr reluctantly took the job because of the “current environment,” which could be perceived as a tacit criticism of the Trump administration or the Senate confirmation process. Or both:
Trump's attorney general nominee William Barr: "In the current environment the American people have to know that there are places in the government where the rule of law — not politics — hold sway … the Department of Justice must be that place" https://t.co/MkZQHQJiDI pic.twitter.com/Bc2d62CfiR
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) January 15, 2019
That’s boilerplate for opening statements from Attorney General nominees. This is what Senate Democrats on the panel wanted to hear:
AG nominee Barr: "It is in the best interests of everyone, the president, Congress, and the American people, that this matter be resolved by allowing the special counsel to complete his work. The country needs a credible resolution to these issues." https://t.co/jRQHFvUU7Z pic.twitter.com/6koS7aWi62
— ABC News (@ABC) January 15, 2019
Barr emphasized that the conclusion of Robert Mueller’s investigation required as much transparency as the law allows. That may not be great news for the White House, depending on what Mueller includes in his report. Barr further testified that, despite unending criticism from Trump about Jeff Sessions, his decision to recuse on the Russia probe was “probably correct.” Barr also said that he’s known Mueller for 30 years and that he wouldn’t conduct a “witch hunt”:
NEW: "I don't believe Mr. Mueller would be involved in a witch hunt," Attorney General nominee William Barr tells Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham. https://t.co/jRQHFvUU7Z pic.twitter.com/OOeG60fdJh
— ABC News (@ABC) January 15, 2019
Hmmmm. We’ll see if that earns Barr his first Twitter broadside from the Oval Office.
Still, it didn’t all go in one direction. For instance, this is what Senate Republicans wanted to hear:
Graham also reads Strzok/Page anti-Trump text messages, and asks Barr his reaction to them: "I was shocked when I saw them," Barr said.
Barr promises to look into 2016 FBI actions as attorney general.
Graham also raises concerns about DOJ Bruce Ohr's wife working for Fusion GPS
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 15, 2019
At least at the start, Barr’s hearing launched smoothly with few surprises. Perhaps one would be a criticism of Sessions’ decision to press forward with prosecution of Sen. Bob Menendez, which Barr said rested on a “fallacious” legal theory. Barr’s even-handedness and straight-arrow approach will give Senate Democrats few opportunities to launch any effective attacks that will paint Barr as a Trump toady … not that a few of them won’t try anyway. Expect more fireworks later in the program from Spartacus and others who might be looking to launch presidential campaigns, too. If that happens, we’ll see Lindsey Graham’s evil twin make an appearance, no doubt.
Updates to this post will appear at the top in reverse chronological order.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member