Politically dicey, but with a purpose
War is peace, apparently.
“A PR stunt,” says … the Washington Post?
A “passive reaction”?
“Americans are meeting with our former members in the UAE and Kabul.”
“… dangerous phase that might rattle our willingness for denuclearization that had been firm.”
“President Trump has been incredibly clear about the sequencing.”
It’s worth a shot.
“Solid response to my letter, thank you!”
“We had received no response to our inquiries.”
“A bad deal is not an option.”
“Dialogue and saber-rattling can never go together.”
Or a 12-step program to normality.
Wait and see.
“Date & Place set.”
“[T]he U.S. walked out 300 feet before the finish line.”
Up next: Richard Grenell.
“They’re not showing courage in doing what they know is right.”
“The timing of its release devalues this document.”
Trump twisting Rand Paul’s arm?
Delay “probably would make an already parlous situation worse.:
Not a wartime consigliere?
Pompeo: “It has everything to do with her identity as a traitor.”
“My point was simply this: This threat is real.”
Depends on the person, and what the meeting is about.
“It’s time to call out Wikileaks for what it really is…”
The consequences of the Pompeo betrayal?