Endgame?
“This is outrageous conduct by any lawyer. And notice, George, they won’t do it inside the courtroom.”
Nope.
What could go wrong?
Textualism.
C’mon.
Life.
Varsity blues.
“I get how it looks on paper.”
Law and order.
“I made the decision to terminate the representation.”
Soon.
“I hope it works.”
Schadenfreude.
Change.
Thank$.
“Your friend is a thug!”
“I do not have the vast resources to fight Mr. Trump and Mr. Cohen alone.”
Uh oh.
Federalism.
“That’s none of your business.”
Borders.
“I’ve got to talk to him (Schumer) about when would be the best time.”
Wut.
Merit-based.
“I would be shocked if he would agree to that.”
Proof?
Deals.
“All the things Donald Trump railed against, he seems to be morphing into.”
“I’ve actually instructed my people to look into it, yes.”
Okay.
“Is a path to legalization also amnesty, sir?”
Crackdown.
Huh.
Things to come.
The saga continues …
Yep.
“It doesn’t say they have the responsibility to carry out a judicial law.”
Hmmm.
Trending
So much for bipartisan cooperation.
Another one bites the dust
All 50 state capitols on edge