A second bite at a poisonous apple.
It’s all about inclusion. Or something.
Hi, First Amendment!
“We were disappointed in the ruling and view it as a massive prior restraint of free speech.”
Free speech includes views you disagree with.
If he’s snorting, send me his brand of blow.
“Our defense of speech may have a greater or lesser harmful impact on the equality and justice work to which we are also committed…”
“The College Republicans cannot be required to pay a fee that would not be imposed on other organizations…”
Do people forget James Rosen?
“…not giving them any attention will do more to stop school shootings than any gun control measure ever will.”
Silencing the masses?
“Therefore, the university does not have justification to support taking any disciplinary action.”
And if so… why?
“Is that American?”
“How about a shirt with the text of the Second Amendment?”
Let them talk.
A freedom-based proposal for any era.
The dark path of “security” replacing freedom.
“The free press is the despot’s enemy.”
“Our current libel laws are a sham and a disgrace and do not represent American values…”
“Distressingly, even academics who should know better are playing this game.”
“If we disobey this, what else are we going to disobey?”
A brief history of freedom killing legislation.
“You have accomplished NOTHING IN DC.”
“No President should play with censoring news they dislike.”
“If we are disrespecting the flag then we won’t play. Period.”