The Uniform Doesn’t Come With a First Amendment Waiver

Picture the scene. A U.S. Air Force major stands on the Capitol steps in his service uniform, ribbons and all, calling for the president and vice president to be impeached and removed from office. The cameras love it. His attorney calls him a man of conscience. I call him a 17-year officer who knew the rulebook better than anyone defending him now wants to admit, and who decided the cameras were worth breaking his oath anyway.

Advertisement

Maj Jason Watson is facing ten counts under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including three violations of Article 88, the almost-never-used provision that criminalizes “contemptuous words” against the president. His attorney says he is the first major in the history of the U.S. military charged under that article. That is not a talking point in his favor. That is a measure of how far outside the norm his conduct fell.

This is not a free-speech case. It is a contract case. Watson signed up for a legal system civilians do not live under, one that trades away certain freedoms for the authority to wear the uniform and carry a weapon on behalf of the republic. He broke that contract in the most public way he could find, and now he wants the country to treat the resulting charges as persecution rather than the predictable consequence of his own choices.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement