Climate Scam Is Acknowledged. Americans Were Fed Lies, Deserve to Be Compensated.

Before apparently backing off the idea this week, the U.S. Department of Justice had announced the creation of an “Anti-Weaponization Fund” to “provide a systematic process to hear and redress
claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare” from the government.

While the original idea for such a fund might have been on shaky ground – with criticism coming
from both parties – establishing a way to compensate Americans who were victims of the weaponization of the Obama and Biden administrations’ energy policies would be entirely legitimate.

The time is ripe for a serious accounting of the harm done to Americans by climate hysteria,
considering how many mea culpas are now emerging. The latest to line up with at least some nod to
truth and accuracy is the New York Times, the leading “mainstream” media proponent of climate change nonsense.

The Times last week produced a story headlined, “Why Scientists Retired the Dire Climate Scenario Used for Over a Decade.” The story reported that an international team of researchers has
“abandoned a dire — and often criticized — high-emissions scenario known as RCP8.5 that has been prominently cited in thousands of climate studies over the past decade. The authors said the scenario was now ‘implausible’ given recent energy trends.”