Feeding Our Fraud: Mostly Guilty

As I say, this was a massive case featuring a large cast of seven defendants — the biggest criminal trial ever in federal court here. It can’t have been an easy case for the prosecutors to try. Lead prosecutor Joe Thompson took two hours for a closing argument (and 45 minutes rebuttal) summarizing the numerous charges against each of the defendants. Defense counsel took something like 10 hours over two days to make their closing arguments.

Advertisement

Thompson might have slighted the argument to be made against one or more of the defendants in his closing, but the prosecution largely prevailed. The not-guilty verdicts on some of the bribery charges may reflect doubt about the government’s cooperating witness on the bribery allegations. That witness has pleaded guilty and has yet to be sentenced by Judge Brasel.

Attorney Steve Schleicher gave the best defense closing. His client (Said Farah) was acquitted. I thought if Farah had the funds to pay Schleicher’s hourly rate the government must have left a lot of cash on the table when it executed its warrant on defendants’ premises in January 2022.

Ed Morrissey

Read it all. Scott did a good job of covering the trial in person, and has given us plenty of context for the case -- and scooped the local news on the bribe attempt. I did err earlier; the passport fraud charge was part of the indictment against Abdiaziz Farah, and the jury convicted him on it. Not that there was much doubt on that charge, of course.

Next up will be more trials for the 45 remaining defendants, unless their lawyers look at what just happened and start playing Let's Make a Deal. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement