I think she was a good to very good speaker. In interviews and other occasions I had to speak with her, she’s not what you’d call an intellectual, and I dislike this habit she has of interrupting her own sentences and changing direction like a pinball that’s just hit a bumper. But she’s a sharpie, believe me. Maybe not up there with Schumer, but good political instincts.

But simple question: How can you preside over the biggest ass-whupping since 1938 and keep your job? You can’t. Simple…

I don’t care about all this gaming out of the future. It doesn’t matter whether she’ll be good or merely bad or spectacularly bad. What matters is, you lose 65 seats, you resign. Period. There should not be a question.