Scott Jennings Signing Up for Another 3 Years at CNN

AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

Scott Jennings is sticking with CNN. 

Thank God. 

Like you, most of my exposure to cable news from any station comes through clips on X, and my favorite ones are almost invariable clips of Scott Jennings in the midst of a political debate on CNN. 

Advertisement

I have long feared that Fox or another network would try to poach him from CNN because he is a standout talent. He and Harry Enten are the best things going on the failing network, and it's hard to see how CNN can retain a single viewer outside the friends, families, and employees (maybe) of the company and its "talent." 

A while back I wrote one of my occasional "things I like" columns about Scott, and he and I correspond a bit. He's a smart and funny guy and has infinitely more patience than I. Where I would have to restrain myself from throwing a coffee cup at some lefty for lying through his teeth, Scott calmly slices and dices their hypocritical arguments with that disarming southern twang and logic bombs. 

Fox would have been the natural (and wrong) place for him to wind up if he were poached, and the last thing Fox needs is yet another conservative talking head. 

Advertisement

Scott's no troll, and his goal isn't to "own" the libs but to reach the audience, many of whom watch CNN by habit and rarely hear anything but the same pablum that gets pushed out by all the Pravda Media. It speaks well of CNN that he is a regular on their panels, and I would love to see a Crossfire show with him and Van Jones, who is Scott's liberal alter-ego. They get alone, are both smart, and have dramatically different points of view. 

CNN, what do you say? I would watch it. 

Scott bridges the gap between the MAGA folks and the older establishment Republicans--he has put his time in Washington and retains credibility with them--but he has drifted Trumpward as Trump has proven himself to be a far better and more canny leader than those of us who were skeptics expected. 

Advertisement

Scott does have an advantage that his interlocutors on the channel do not: he uses his brain and doesn't stick to the talking points that are always distributed to talking heads before they go on the air. I used to do a "crossfire"-type debate segment on a Minnesota TV show and I was always struck that my debate partner came in with pages of talking points emailed to her. 

Scott isn't hobbled by the need to regurgitate. He sticks to reality, not spin.

CNN viewers need a bit of reality to penetrate their bubble. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement