Wait, You Can Protest Art Without Violence?

Oct 15, 2026 8:40 AM
Premium
Advertisement
Wait, You Can Protest Art Without Violence?
AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean
VIP

Let's give some modern-day censors credit.

They don't always want to silence artists or inhibit certain views from being heard. They're just plain scared. 

Some recent cancelled stars include singer Matisyahu, actor/author Brett Gelman ("Stranger Things") and actor/comedian Michael Rapaport ("Beautiful Girls," "Atypical"). They've been punished for either being Jewish, supporting Israel or both. 

Their cancellations came after violent threats flooded the venues where they were scheduled to appear. That was also the case with author Alyssa Rosenheck of "White. Blonde. Jew." fame. Her Nashville book store appearance suffered a similar fate.

Let the show go on as planned and you may face the consequences. The right answer, of course, is to deny the "heckler's veto" and/or hire security guards to ensure no one gets hurt. Here's betting more than a few retired cops or military veterans would be happy to help, maybe free of charge.

This is the New Normal, one that legacy media outlets are loathe to cover, let alone connect the necessary dots. Why are pro-Palestinian movements so quick to threaten violence (let alone carry it out)?

Now, there's another protest afoot, but this one is ... different.

Pro-Israel activists are speaking out against "NAZA." The new documentary alleges IDF forces are regularly committing war crimes and targeting Palestinian civilians. 

The film has received rapturous receptions on the film festival circuit, and it looks to make serious noise this awards season.

True? False? It's a documentary, and art should be allowed to be seen and heard.

The folks protesting the film aren't trying to silence it.

“Our message is clear: wherever lies are told about Israel, we will show up with the truth,” said Aya Shechter, the Israeli-American Council (IAC)’s chief operating officer in a statement.

A similar protest held in New York last month found a similar sentiment. Screen the movie, and let other voices also be heard.

“We’re here not because we’re saying, don’t show the film,” [Israeli-American Council] co-chair Tal Shuster said of NAZA during the New York rally. “Everyone has the freedom of speech, that’s the United States. We are saying: it’s not all the facts. Show everything else, not just the documentary.”

Another important note? The "NAZA" screenings didn't have to beef up security due to the protesters. They didn't threaten violence, nor were they attempting to shut the movie down. 

A recent performance of "October 7" at Northwestern University got interrupted when someone pulled a fire alarm. Just an accident, we're sure. Thankfully, the show went on anyway.

Now, compare that to this response to Rapaport's Portland appearance two years ago.

If you look really hard and squint you can see the difference between the two protests.

One side of the intractable Israel/Palestinian conflict wants to simply get their message out and let people decide. The other? If you let the people decide for themselves, and you'll pay a hefty price.

Which one sounds more appealing?

Comments

Recommended

Trending on HotAir Videos