Prediction: “as unresponsive as possible, while telling the truth.”
“This committee got rolled.”
“There was a discrepancy in preparation, and it created an unequal footing.”
Nadler’s uncomfortable choice.
“We’re not sure why we’re fighting with Republicans.”
Pleas and ploys.
After being given immunity to testify
Is he a rat or a reformed rat?
“They said it was fake news.”
“This is a watershed moment.”
“You need to stand on your feet, overcome your shame, and say something.”
“We communicate not only with words, but with our body language and demeanor.”
A non-answer is a no. Schedule the vote.
Sticking to the story
Followed by Peter Strzok’s public testimony on Thursday.
“Anybody who is facing 30 years never stands up.”
“Antifa and violent groups had decided that Berkeley was their domain…”
“He believes it is important for the American people to hear the truth directly from him…”
What does he have to lose, besides possibly his job?
“Where’s the ‘there’ there?”
The big story.
Interesting way to look at things.
Promises U.S. strategy is working.