“Informant” the key?
“The IG is thought to be looking at everything from political bias to how evidence was handled in the Clinton email case.”
“…told the agents that he had not authorized the disclosure to the WSJ and did not know who did”
“Comey, the report states, recalled that McCabe had denied authorizing FBI officials speak to the Journal…”
No one told Shulkin about it?
“Isn’t the I.G. an Obama guy?”
“…yes, it will be investigated.”
“He was totally dishonest about it.”
Get along, little doggies
“[L]ack of confidence in VHA adequately and timely fixing the root causes of these issues.”
It’s not just about Director Comey.
Put it on my tab
Different day, same tragedy
None of your business
“It is very harmful to her and increases the likelihood and pressure on DOJ to indict.”
“…there was no one enforcing the rules at that time.”
“Are you accusing the Inspector General of the State Department of having an anti-Clinton bias?”
It’s good to be the Queen.
“Let’s get separate address or device but I don’t want any risk of the personal being accessible.”
Circle the wagons.
“This is not merely a difference of opinion between the State Department and the Department of Justice.”
Gross negligence morphs into utter contempt.
NBC: IG, aides needed to get higher clearances to view Hillary e-mails.
“Inaccurate and incomplete.”
So much for the narrative.
“… raises suspicions that there is something more there than just stupidity.”
“It’s intimidating. It’s what it was supposed to be.”