Can they do that? Sure. Should they?
Bonus shot at the patriarchy.
Let’s not get carried away here
Spinning the “straight” in straight talk
Smile for the camera
These are unrelated issues
Solving only a small part of the larger problem
It’s hard to argue that it’s both
The battle is over but not the war
Words are “powerful weapons”
Things are heating up down under
Not the same, but they share a few cautionary tales
It’s complicated… in more ways than one
The parallels should be obvious
An old battle still being fought down under
A twist on the same old song and dance
More, but not as quickly.
It’s a battle down under, but almost an exact mirror of the one in the US
It was a bad bill.
A bridge too far?
All in the families
“People want to know how you’re different. It’s time to tell how we’re different.”
“There’s an Iowa Ted and a New York Ted.”
“Roe v. Wade is current law, but it doesn’t mean that we don’t continue to aspire to fix it.”
Spinning and lying, lying and spinning
“He thanked her for her courage and told her, ‘Stay strong.'”
Elected duties vs. optional duties
Disorder in the court
Denied, but not denied yet
Sort of. Or maybe not.
Build, not destroy
Semantics in state-sanctioned oppression.
Sorry, not sorry. No, wait… I’m sorry after all
“It is irresponsible to promote this drug at this time.”
Been there, done that.