We’ve got some serious subject matter experts here, folks
“…they ought to leave the foreign policy to us”
“Why don’t you stay in your lane and step the f*** off?”
“You come in here and you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don’t respond to that.”
“Well, I’m not there.”
“I think he’s held up well.”
“No American should be told that his or her public service is unwelcome because ‘the dogma lives loudly within you’ …”
“Before you start pooping on people and what they’ve done, you got to do something too.”
That’s not how any of this works
“Are you with Dianne or not?”
“I think that’s tragic. I think that needs to be looked into.”
FBI: “No corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.”
Markey: “It’s obviously a cover-up.”
Schumer: Did the White House interfere?
“This isn’t a story; it’s a page from the National Enquirer.”
“You don’t say”
“She spoke her truth …”
“Word began leaking out on the Hill about it, and Feinstein was approached by Democrats on the committee…”
“…direct the FBI to re-open its background investigation and thoroughly examine the multiple allegations of sexual assault.”
The closer you look, the weaker it seems
“…put a bullet in his … skull.”
Awkward: Ford attorneys listed as headliners for Senate Dem fundraiser.
“I think this has been a mess from start to finish.”
“Dr. Ford’s attorney could have approached my office…”
Splitting the Hispanic vote?
“I’m not sure what the point of it is.”
“Precedent is the foundation of our system.”
“Is there a double standard here?”
“They just kept it quiet.”
Democrat civil war, part 2,391
Welcome back, catch-and-release!
Perhaps you never asked?
“We have precedents that clearly establish that.”
Follow the money.
An unlikely challenge
Might want to give that one a second look, Uncle Joe
One’s fine with no conviction, the other not so much
Donations for endorsements?