“I have never been to Prague in my life.”
I guess they’re all plotting against him
More smoke, still searching for fire
Build your own monster
“a distinction that doesn’t make a difference”
“the piece about…Putin purported preference for Trump, we think is not supported by the evidence.”
“Burr just told me he’s seen “NO” evidence of collusion yet…”
Susan Rice: “Knock it off.”
“If it were exclusively a legal judgment…”
Russia links didn’t pan out?
“I would be very careful if I were President Trump here.”
“What is known, however, is that the election was close…”
“Mueller’s work is expected to continue for months…”
But on whom?
Never talked to Donald Trump?
“…no conclusions have been reached on the key question of Trump and collusion”
NYT: New target?
Explosive, or a dud?
Wonderful thing, subpoenas.
Er … why?
“we did so without informing him whom we were working for…”
“It is an explosive problem, this use of the dossier by the Obama Justice Department…”
“It would be a tragedy if the report has a minority section…”
“It would be better to be aggressive and gather evidence quickly, he believed…”
“It is vital we get the story right and retain the trust we have built with our audience…”
Or was it the transition?
“There’s no crime of collusion.”
“Manafort knows where the bodies are buried.”
Almost entirely relates to 2006-14.
Panetta: Of course we have to probe DNC and Team Hillary connections to dossier.
Follow the money.
WaPo: My, how quiet the Democrats have become.