“According to a source, he told Trump it would make things worse for him with Robert Mueller.”
NYT: Trump may have obstructed justice by telling Sessions to reverse recusal.
“Investigation names…are designed to refer to facts, ideas, or people related to the investigation.”
Just what exactly happened in that infamous June 2016 meeting in Trump Tower? Everyone will get a chance to find …
“I think the president should not go anywhere near this [Mueller team].”
“So disgraceful that the questions concerning the Russian Witch Hunt were “leaked” to the media.”
HIC Republicans: No collusion, but plenty of blame to go around.
“[Trump] keeps talking about jobs and the economy, and we talk about Russia.”
“I have never been to Prague in my life.”
I guess they’re all plotting against him
More smoke, still searching for fire
Build your own monster
“a distinction that doesn’t make a difference”
“the piece about…Putin purported preference for Trump, we think is not supported by the evidence.”
“Burr just told me he’s seen “NO” evidence of collusion yet…”
Susan Rice: “Knock it off.”
“If it were exclusively a legal judgment…”
Russia links didn’t pan out?
“I would be very careful if I were President Trump here.”
“What is known, however, is that the election was close…”
“Mueller’s work is expected to continue for months…”
But on whom?
Never talked to Donald Trump?
“…no conclusions have been reached on the key question of Trump and collusion”
NYT: New target?
Explosive, or a dud?
Wonderful thing, subpoenas.
Er … why?
“we did so without informing him whom we were working for…”
“It is an explosive problem, this use of the dossier by the Obama Justice Department…”