Whose party is this anyway?
“Maybe it is innocent, maybe not.”
WSJ: Leveraging meeting to get Burisma probe.
“… a process completely devoid of any merit or legitimacy.”
“It shows that Schiff is a fraud.”
Whistleblower to meet with House Intel instead.
“Why has there not been a full House vote authorizing these impeachment proceedings?”
“If they [Democrats] would just shut the f-up, they’d win everything.”
Also: Shouldn’t the courts intervene in impeachment?
” … really an assault on the electorate, not just this president.”
“keeping open the options for all of us”
“Where you have few facts, you have much speculation,” says …
“Do not pursue it for trivial partisan political purposes.”
“This is fine.” “No, it isn’t.” “Yes, it is.”
“…it wasn’t easy to get him to tell a narrative.”
“This committee got rolled.”
“Behind closed doors.”
Shadows of things to come
On the fence
Public statements and reports aren’t enough, apparently.
Suddenly, declassifying’s not cool any more.
Adam Schiff, Narrative Killer?
All about the primary
Mueller letter: Nothingburger?
“The evidence is so weighty that the Justice Department needs to consider this.”
“Shouldn’t you be looking at that…”
Pelosi: Stop being “scaredy-cats.”
“Talk about an oxymoron.”
“In the absence of very graphic evidence…”
“Yes, I think it is a mistake.”
“Witness testimony, a public hearing, or well-rehearsed theater”?
“We were never going find a contract signed in blood saying, ‘Hey Vlad, we’re going to collude’.”
“Brief and social in nature”?
“Dont let the press platform off this and dont help the pigs build cases.”
Even the playing field
“And so all these moves are moves towards impeachment.”