Initial jobless claims "unexpectedly" under 400K

The markets got a bit of a boost with a surprise announcement that initial jobless claims dropped to a seasonally-adjusted 398,000 for the week ending July 23, down from an upwardly-adjusted (by 4,000) 422,000 the prior week. Because once again, the “experts” weren’t even close, Reuters broke out a variant of its usual adjective to describe this. This time, however, it’s because the “experts” missed rather badly on the high side – they expected the number to come in at 415,000.

Advertisement

The first question is whether it actually is under 400K. That’s actually a two-part question. I will say that a significant part of the drop is real – the non-seasonally-adjusted number was a bit under 367K last week, a drop of 103K from the prior week. I’ll leave it to the pros and the tin-foil-hat types to argue whether 398K is a “real” number or a political one that “conveniently” popped up when it did.

Is it going to end up being under 400K once the almost-inevitable upward revision happens? The trend is not Obama’s friend here – Tom Blumer has been charting the upward revisions of late, and through the prior 19 weeks, the average upward revision from the initial numbers has been just over 4K. Only 2 of those 19 weeks saw revisions of less than 2K.

The second question is whether it should have been expected. Again, I’ll turn to the seasonally-unadjusted data in the various press releases as that provides the prior year’s data. In 2009, there was a 74K drop in the unadjusted jobless claims between 7/16 and 7/23. In 2010, there was a 91K drop in the unadjusted jobless claims between 7/17 and 7/24. Judging by recent performance, most of this should have been expected.

Advertisement

This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement