Over the past year, Minnesota has become a national symbol in political rhetoric about government waste and fraud. Republican lawmakers and allied commentators have repeatedly pointed to the state as evidence that public benefit programs—especially Medicaid and child-care subsidies—are riddled with abuse. Headlines and hearing soundbites now regularly invoke figures in the “billions,” suggesting a system so compromised that ordinary oversight has failed. Yet when one steps back from the rhetoric and examines what has actually been confirmed in court over the past two years, a different and more prosaic picture comes into view.
Start with what is not in dispute. Minnesota has experienced real fraud in publicly funded programs. The most notorious example remains the pandemic-era Feeding Our Future case, one of the largest school-meals fraud schemes in U.S. history. But that case belongs to the COVID emergency period and predates the current controversy. The more relevant question—if one is assessing claims about present governance—is what has been confirmed recently, not what was uncovered during a once-in-a-century emergency that overwhelmed oversight systems nationwide.
Restricting attention to roughly the past two years, the dollar amounts tied to confirmed fraud in Minnesota are modest by national standards. Recent prosecutions and guilty pleas have centered largely on Medicaid-funded services, particularly autism-related therapy programs and a small number of housing-stabilization providers. Taken together, the fraud amounts established through convictions or guilty pleas during this period total roughly $25 million, give or take, depending on how overlapping cases are counted. This is not trivial money. But it is a far cry from the “billions” that dominate political talking points.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member