Female Vet: Hegseth’s Right About Women in Combat

As a woman who served proudly in the U.S. Army for ten years — five years in the Army Reserve and five on active duty — I wholeheartedly agree with Hegseth here: women should not be placed in combat roles. ...

Advertisement

What I am saying, however, is that putting women in combat should not be the goal, and the reason for that is simple: most can’t — and shouldn’t — handle it. And that fact is made abundantly clear by the fact that most, “G.I. Jane” notwithstanding, can’t even make it through training and meet the standards set for men in the same roles.

What Hegseth said on that point was exactly right: women in combat roles have not made the military “more effective” or “more lethal.”

Ed Morrissey

Standards should be maintained for such roles. Women who meet them and are motivated to serve in combat roles should be allowed to do so. But those standards should be crafted for maximum lethality and effectiveness, not for DEI aspirations. 

The IDF seems to be very effective with women in combat roles, but that’s in part due to maintaining standards for max effectiveness too. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement