America Does Not Need a Sovereign Wealth Fund

The U.S. government, in contrast, has no extra money to launch a sovereign wealth fund. The federal government is $35 trillion in debt and has been running sizable budget deficits for more than two decades. What’s more, its budget problems are expected to worsen in the coming years. Social Security obligations are growing, as are health-care payments for an aging population. ...

Advertisement

A sovereign wealth fund would be a way for a president to have access to money without having to deal with Congress. But as such, it could quickly become a dangerous slush fund. Theoretically, an independent board could manage the fund; some advocates point to the Federal Reserve as a model. Norway’s fund is managed by a team at its central bank. But keep in mind that Trump has considered firing the Fed chair. Imagine what would happen if the sovereign wealth fund lost money on a key investment or refused to fund a president’s pet project. The concept comes with myriad risks and few clear benefits.

Ed Morrissey

Heather's a reliable econ reporter, and her analysis here is solid, if too heavy on the Trump-related risks she sees. This is a bad idea no matter who gets elected to the White House. Just this sentence alone should frighten anyone who believes in checks and balances: "A sovereign wealth fund would be a way for a president to have access to money without having to deal with Congress."

That's good enough for me to oppose it with every fiber of my being. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement