Is Richard Dawkins Now a Christian?

The distinction between a believing Christian and a cultural Christian is dubious, because religion is culture. Belief is not, or not just, an invisible thing in one’s head — it takes the form of culture. A lot of people are not sure if they believe, or are not sure how to articulate their half-belief, but sometimes take part in Christian worship — even if it’s just singing the occasional carol, as Dawkins himself enjoys doing. Dawkins wants to categorize such people as merely cultural Christians, like him, not believing ones. But there is no clear distinction.  

Advertisement

In Dawkins’ view, it is harmless and even healthy to participate in Christian culture a little bit, for there is a “beauty” and “decency” to it, but it is deeply mistaken to cross the line into “belief.” But there wouldn’t be any Christian culture if there weren’t plenty of committed believers, and there is no clear line between mild participation and tentative belief. In practice, someone who values Christian culture, and sometimes dips a toe in, and is more nuanced and honest than Dawkins, often admits to believing a bit too. I’m sorry if it confuses the sciencey mind, but religious belief just isn’t black and white.

Ed Morrissey

I'm not clear on Dawkins' argument either. If you argue that the belief system of Christianity delivers a clear benefit to society at large, are you not in fact expressing a belief in it at some level? And isn't that more true given Dawkins' previous positions that any and all beliefs are detrimental?

FWIW, atheism is also a belief system -- a belief that there is no god at all. There isn't evidence to support that position, only an absence of direct scientific evidence to the contrary. The absence of belief is agnosticism, not atheism, and agnosticism at least holds itself open to further evidence. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement