Fani Willis moved to reopen evidence n the matter of her disqualification. We agreed and offered new evidence of our own. Willis then reversed course and moved to shut down all new evidence. My lawyers filed this reply today.
— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) March 8, 2024
https://t.co/Yogv1bJbSe pic.twitter.com/hoLqY2OpIa
The irony of the staff of one district attorney’s office objecting to a member of another district attorney’s office prepared to come forward and testify regarding the disqualification of a district attorney should not be lost on the Court.
The State’s opposition to the testimony of Ms. Yeager and Mr. Arora is particularly perplexing in light of the fact that the prosecution itself had requested that this Court accept an affidavit (not sworn under penalty of perjury) from Mr. Herbert Brody, a wine salesperson or, in the event that the Court declined to accept Mr. Brody’s affidavit, requested that Mr. Brody be permitted to testify. See Notice of Filing State’s Proposed Supplemental Exhibit 1 to the Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Disqualify.In making its request to present the testimony of Mr. Brody, the prosecution cited no alleged standards relating to “finality” or failure to present evidence in a timely manner.
(via Twitchy)
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.