So confident (delusional) was Lindell of his claims that he even created a contest offering $5 Million to anybody who could demonstrate that the “evidence” he provided of “election fraud” was not related to the theft of the 2020 election. Came then computer forensics specialist Robert Zeidman, who entered Lindell’s contest and did just that — although Lindell’s team of judges apparently sought to avoid paying out by the simple expedient of ignoring his work. Well, not anymore. A panel of binding arbitrators has decided that Lindell must indeed pay, given Zeidman’s demonstration that Lindell’s proffered “evidence” of “packet capture” was little more than random internet garbage bearing no connection whatsoever to the 2020 election, let alone its alleged theft.

This announcement comes on the heels of Fox News settling with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million on Monday over a suspiciously similar set of lies and defamatory statements repeated on their air (Dominion is also suing Lindell for a cool $1.3 billion). …

These results point to a series of conclusions that couldn’t be more clear[.]