What’s fascinating about The Hollywood Reporter’s coverage of the news is the reaction from supposedly neutral journalists.

Vulture critic Kathryn VanArendonk wrote, “This faithful adaptation of harry potter, announced with absolutely bulls*** craven disdain for rowling’s political impact, is bad.”

Reporter Sean T. Collins wrote, “If you interview an actor or filmmaker or executive involved with the Harry Potter tv show and don’t lead with a question about JK Rowling leading a hate group you’re done, over, out of the art club.”

Out magazine tweeted: “We don’t want any new Harry Potter content if noted transphobe J.K. Rowling is involved.”

[There’s hardly any such thing as “neutral journalists” any longer, especially in the entertainment industry. They have been co-opted by the elites of the industry they’re supposed to report on. It’s almost entirely corrupt now, and this is just the latest example. — Ed]