In a sane world, the rules for voting would be simple and with very few exceptions: one verified citizen, one vote, on one day. Making exceptions in special cases would of course be allowed, but for the vast majority of people, these requirements are not onerous, and they are required to ensure confidence in the fairness of elections.
In fact, that is a bare minimum, along with using paper ballots.
The SAVE Act, which is before Congress, doesn't even go this far. It merely requires proof of citizenship and voter ID, and it is freaking the Democrats out.
Gee, I wonder why. I can't imagine a single reason. It is a mystery.
Doesn’t this act get old?
— AG (@AGHamilton29) February 2, 2026
Schumer used the same line to describe Georgia laws that indisputably expanded voter access back in 2022.
It’s incredibly offensive and unserious to pretend that every voting law equates to a renewal of Jim Crow. https://t.co/ApJGJsDigz pic.twitter.com/dGz3K0EBtW
The Democrats are going to their old standby argument, they trot out for everything they dislike: it is racist, Black people are too stupid or indolent to get identification. People who need ID for just about everything else necessary in modern life, or to buy cigarettes or alcohol, are suddenly incapable of doing something that every other American does as a matter of routine.
We're back to Jim Crow! https://t.co/2xiRGupvtn
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) February 2, 2026
Not only Americans, but a bunch of states are even handing out driver's licenses to illegal aliens, who are presumed to be smarter and more industrious than black people.
🚨 BREAKING: In a stunning blow to Democrats, 76% PERCENT of BLACK Americans want nationwide voter ID — in other words, the SAVE America Act
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 3, 2026
White voters: 85% want it
Latino voters: 82% want it
Another leftist narrative just got decimated.
Pass voter ID. GET THIS PASSED. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/HFnVtlccvh
Of course, it's all crap, and everybody knows it, no matter what they say. Not a single one of these people actually believes it unless they are even more racist than they appear. They make these arguments because they are desperately concerned to maintain their vote harvesting schemes that solidify their massive margins in deep Blue districts, and which give them vital margins in national and statewide races.
Massive voter registration fraud exposed in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election. All the voter registration applications contained the same handwriting, contained the same date with unknown signatures not matching anything contained on file. pic.twitter.com/r4KvNKjO9Q
— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) February 2, 2026
Voter ID is not unpopular with any demographic group except Democratic activists. Even ordinary Democrats like the idea because they aren't in on the scheme. As Democratic states are fighting tooth and nail to prevent any effort to make them clean up their voter rolls, as is, by the way, required by federal law, they are also busy enabling massive voter registration fraud, with thousands of people registered at some addresses, hundreds at others, and submitting obviously fraudulent names and addresses.
138 voters registered at a commercial address in Georgia
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) February 2, 2026
Georgia Law says voters can’t be registered at a commercial address
David Khait “It’s blatant — These suspicious places where a ton of people are registered to vote from”
“138 people don’t live here” pic.twitter.com/WyyjAnHhIw
Republicans in the Senate have been VERY slow to push the SAVE Act, which suggests to me that they are using it as a negotiating tool, or that some Senator or another within their own caucus is quaking in their boots, worried about being called a racist.
Requiring voters to prove their citizenship is one of the most popular ideas in the country, with 84 percent of Americans supporting and only 15 percent opposed. That’s why 36 states and most of the world’s developed countries already have it on the books.
To most Americans, the only thing suspicious about voter ID is why anyone would oppose it. Surely no one wants noncitizens voting, right? Right?
Actually, Democrat leaders, donors, and activists very much want noncitizens voting. Elected Democrats are perfectly aware that the party machine registers ineligible voters and harvests their ballots as a matter of course. They also know that their woke base believes voter ID laws are pure evil, part of Donald Trump’s neo-fascist conspirazzzzzzzzzzz…
Conventional political wisdom, therefore, dismisses voter ID as a legislative nonstarter. Sure, Republicans could pass a bill like the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act through the House of Representatives, as they did last April. But Senate Democrats would filibuster it, denying the GOP the 60 votes they’d need to end debate and pass the bill.
I don't KNOW the backroom reasons, but whatever they are, they are bad ones.
BREAKING:
— ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) February 3, 2026
.@RepLuna (R-FL) said that she was given assurance the Senate will move forward with a standing filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act.
The SAVE America Act = proof of citizenship + photo voter ID.
Don’t stop until it’s done. pic.twitter.com/nnbgEHwlQt
Rachel Bovard at The Federalist has a modest proposal. Allow the Democrats to filibuster, but only in the old "Mr Smith Goes to Washington" way. Instead of the lazy way that happens now, where votes to invoke cloture fail, just make the Democrats actually get up and make the arguments until their throats are too dry to speak. You know, Corey Booker style.
For Senate Republicans, the strategy is all upside.
Today, they are staring down the barrel of a midterm election rout and two years of investigations and impeachments. On their current course, Democrats’ illegal voter registration programs will continue apace, and their violent, insurrectionist activists will declare victory in 2026 and start working on 2028.
Senate Republicans could reverse all those trends in a matter of days just by putting the House-passed voter ID bill on the Senate floor.
A Real Filibuster
Politicos who have only been Congress-watching this century have a funhouse-mirrors notion of the U.S. Senate’s legislative procedure.
In the post-Harry Reid Senate, majorities only bring bills to the floor once negotiators have secured 60 votes behind closed doors. Bills are called up Monday evening, and a cloture motion (to end debate) is immediately filed, starting a countdown clock that leads to a vote by Thursday.This is not how the Senate is supposed to function. The old Senate process — with open-ended debate — is still the rules default setting. If Senate Republicans considered the SAVE Act under the traditional process, it would spring a trap from which Democrats might never recover.
Senators like to tell you that the Senate is the world's most august deliberative body, but no actual deliberation takes place there anymore. They don't even engage in the pretense anymore. There is some blather on the floor, but no real debate, no genuine explanations or arguments. It is purely performative, and the performances are generally bad, halfhearted, and the actors aren't even attractive.
How about making them debate? It doesn't violate the rules. In fact, this is what the rules were meant to require.
— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) February 3, 2026
Here’s how it would work. Leader Thune would call up the House-passed voter ID bill. At this point, the Senate would be “on” the SAVE Act. Senate rules would dictate that a vote on the bill — at a 51-vote simple majority threshold — must be the next thing the Senate does. The only way to delay that vote is for a senator to stand up and speak — indefinitely.
It’s harder to sustain than it sounds. To give an hours-long speech, a senator may not leave the floor, not even to use the restroom. He may not sit. He may not eat. If he so much as leans on his desk, he loses the floor, which either triggers the vote or requires another senator to begin speaking.
Democrat colleagues could piggyback on the filibuster and give long speeches of their own — but only two per senator. Once every filibustering senator’s speeches have been exhausted, the SAVE Act vote happens automatically.
Cloture — the 60 votes required to end debate the easy way — isn’t needed. Sheer physical exertion will carry the day.
Of course, making this happen requires a bit of actual work on the part of Republicans. Or not exactly work. It requires the ability to sit through boring speeches until the Democrats give up. Not everybody is Corey Booker, after all. And no doubt some of the Democratic Senators lack passion on this issue anyway, or at least enough to get up off their asses and give a long speech without a bathroom break.
Why are Democrats against the SAVE Act?
— Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) February 3, 2026
Because Kamala Harris only won states that don’t require voter ID.
It’s clear Democrats oppose voter ID because they want to cheat in our elections. pic.twitter.com/Hged3p4l9T
I won't argue, exactly, that the squishier Republicans like the way things have been for decades, and are perhaps not as outraged by the status quo ante, but it's pretty clear that a lot of them are quite comfortable enjoying the perks and privileges they enjoy as the Republic declines.
🚨🇺🇸 VIRGINIA DEMS' FIRST MOVE WITH NEW MAJORITY: BAN HAND-COUNTING BALLOTS
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 20, 2026
Forty-eight hours. That's all it took.
Virginia's new Democratic majority introduced HB968, forcing machine-readable ballots through scanners and prohibiting hand counts "for any reason" unless… pic.twitter.com/Upne9eQIFh
It will surely last beyond their own lifetimes, and they likely believe that the rot will somehow be patched up before the collapse. And it is DIFFICULT to fight against it, so why try?
But as the polling shows, passing the SAVE Act will hurt nobody politically. It only requires a willingness to make the Democrats put their money where their mouth is. Nobody will lose a set because they voted for this bill, even if the Democrats call them racist. That card has been played so much that nobody takes it seriously anyway.
It can be done. So do it.
- Editor's note: If we thought our job in pushing back against the Academia/media/Democrat censorship complex was over with the election, think again. This is going to be a long fight. If you want to join the conversation in the comments -- and support independent platforms -- why not join our VIP Membership program? Choose VIP to support Hot Air and access our premium content, VIP Gold to extend your access to all Townhall Media platforms and participate in this show, or VIP Platinum to get access to even more content and discounts on merchandise. Use the promo code FIGHT to join or to upgrade your existing membership level today, and get 60% off!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member