'The Notion of Masculinity' Eluding Dems as Newsom Shimmies

AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

If ever there was a brief, shining moment in the annals of 'Exactly the Opposite of What We're Talking About,' it would be these thirty-one seconds of soydom on display.

Advertisement

Democrats have a masculinity problem, for sure, and on several fronts.

As a party, they are dominated by screaming, screeching, constantly bitching harridans in every shade of the rainbow. That's one tell.

Another is that the few 'men' (I use that term lightly) one does see who are persistently front and centre representing the party's male contingent, are the sort of mewling, mealy-mouthed, twee whiners often interchangeable with their more vociferous Democratic sisters.

There is not a lumberjack or plumber among them. Not even a league bowling champion, for crying out loud. I see Fetterman in my head as the lone dude.

There are, however, a plethora of Swalwells, Bookers, Schumers, Hoggs, Sissons, Murphys, Blumenthals, Van Hollens, Warners, Wankers (okay - I made that up), and Kerrys et al to last a lifetime. A greasy, snivelling, five-o'clock shadowed, finger-wagging menagerie, and I rattled those off without even really trying.

Democrats recognise they are testosterone-challenged. Even when their one quest was to find that 'every man,' that 'dude' they so desperately needed for Kamala Harris to have some sort of rapport with Americans, she was so unfamiliar with the 'masculine' concept, she picked the buffoon in buffalo plaid from Minnesota.

Did he tell her he could fix a truck or knew the right end of a shotgun? How would she or any of her staff ever know the difference? And Dougie surely was no help, oozing the big T as he does.

Advertisement

Their sad attempts during the campaign, having to appeal to men - white men, especially, which really must have hurt - were done partially tongue in cheek. You could tell the creators weren't sure if they were lampooning themselves and should be angry about it. Or if their wives or AWFLs would be.

DID YOU MEAN TO INSULT MY BROTHER CHAD?!

Best tread carefully before one slips into toxic territory.

Dems don't want THOSE 'men.'

They'd rather have women who claimed to be men before dealing with that.

It has now been a year of frantic introspection with no answer and no resulting stra-tee-gery to return the working man of old to the fold.

We get this revolting display of bloviating buffoon and prancing poltroon, accentuated by that peculiar Newsom shimmy-shimmy-cocobot, as both Democrat governors opine on a theme they know nothing about and have no experience with.

This excruciating exchange is sure to send men streaming back...so far in their chairs, howling, that they may fall over.

Take precautions - I'm not liable for your lack of self-control.

What the furk fark even IS this?

All Walz the dumbass can do is go 'Yeah. Yeah.' Like, you know, even he, dense as he is, is wondering what the hell is Newsom's problem.

Advertisement

He should be glad he could only see him from the chest up. Timmy'd probably squint in pain.

Takes a special kind of man. Really special.

Then again, when you're a hero in your own mind, you already are special.

Like when you have to share the story of being so close to a fire that your oleaginous coiffure goes up in flames as if you were Michael Jackson filming a Pepsi commercial.

The difference is that there is actually film of Jackson going up in flames. 

Which is why Newsom thinks he can dissect masculinity with a doofus like Walz, who says the right's upset with him because he can fix a truck until he says his identity isn't a beard and 'a truck.'

Jeez.

Maybe Newsom can teach him some moves.

Democrats don't like the way Democrats look. Ruben Gallego, a nasty piece of work in his own right, was recently busted for cracking on the twee-types in his own party in leaked private messages.

Advertisement

At least when he got busted, he said, 'I'm sorry, but...yeah.'

First-year U.S. Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona is facing intensified scrutiny after leaked text messages showed the Democrat deriding the appearance of women and men in his own party. The comments mirror far-right rhetoric about gender and deepen concerns about his recent repositioning on LGBTQ+ issues.

In the messages, first circulated by a conservative outlet and reported by People last week Gallego, who started his first term in the U.S. Senate in January after previously serving in the House, complained that Democrats are “not allowing men to be men” or “women to be hot,” and wrote, “Dem women look like Dem men and Dem men look like women.” He also lamented that Democrats had become “the not fun party” and no longer embodied “sex, drugs, and rock and roll.”

This little segment from the governor guys doesn't get them any closer.

If anything, it amplifies the gender gap between the males of the parties, and it's not pretty.

At HotAir, we’ve been dealing with real government suppression of free speech for YEARS. Despite the threats and consequences, we refuse to go silent and remain committed to delivering the truth.

But we can't do it without your support.

Please help Ed, David, John, and me continue fighting back against government censorship by joining our terrific HotAir VIP community today. Use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

And thank you so much again for being here with us at HotAir.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement