The snark is strong at the WaPo, young Jedi
Another endorsement of the heckler’s veto.
“Suffice to say that the Court has given this matter careful review…”
In it for the long run
The unfairness of it all
Will Pelosi cave to growing pressure?
“It had nothing to do with a quid pro quo.”
I’ve heard crazier things
“…Democratic leadership does not have its impeachment messaging straight.”
“… no evidence shows that Libby disclosed Plame’s role to Novak.”
“Internal polling looks great, the best ever!”
But was Obama?
“Was this an innocent mistake, or a sick joke…”
“The story was that he refused the medal because the fella he tried to save and risked his life saving died. That’s the beginning, middle and end.”
“…you know who else was a vegetarian?”
“This is the God’s truth.”
“…he was actually talking about American births.”
Socialist walks back media conspiracy theory.
Yes, Virginia, there are lone wolves
That’s not how any of this works
We see you, Valerie Jarrett
“They may have been erroneous, but . . . they are opinion protected by the First Amendment.”
Help us, Obamawan. You’re our only hope.
“I wanted to scold him all the time.”
Hey, don’t stop on our account
Might be more than that
Still the economy
Man, that Trump fellow certainly gets around
He’s got a point
“These numbers were debunked in 1969 — 50 years ago…”
Lock them up?
The known unknowns
Sure, why not?
“Dumbassery of the highest order, here, @washingtonpost.”
“This story was an emerging one”
Situational concern, but still a valid point
He didn’t get where he is by being that dumb
“Subsequent reporting…either contradicting or failing to confirm accounts provided in this story…”
“There’s not 51 votes to dismiss it before the managers get to call the case.”
“significant enough to have shifted the document’s meaning…”
“It is certainly not how the executive, current or in the future, should handle such a call.”