State Department
Oct 2016

“…immense pressure to complete the review quickly and not label anything as classified.”

“State has an agenda … to protect State interests and those of Clinton.”

“If not, she should go to”

That was certainly convenient, particularly if you happened to be pondering a presidential bid

Sep 2016
Aug 2016


Are we really entertaining this question?

The standard was set during her confirmation hearings that “smoke” was enough of a problem to cry foul.

Best Cabinet official money can buy.

“This stuff keeps coming out, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip.”

The fruits of paying ransom.

“…the requester had mentioned in the course of the call a Fox network reporter and Iran.”

“This was Iran’s money.”

Money for nothing… or perhaps something

“Secretary Clinton’s ethics agreement did not preclude other State Department officials from having contact with Clinton Foundation staff.”

“Her mission was to help the Clinton Foundation find a new leader…”

“Such laws conflict with and undermine universally recognized human rights”

They can’t understand why anybody would ever question their ethics or their integrity.

“Am I ever going to get an answer to the question about the planes?”

Or did the Iranians know all along?

Jul 2016

What difference at this oh what the hell.

“Our aim is to strengthen the bloc, rather than any one party, [and] in tandem weaken Netanyahu and his right wing parties.”

“a ‘very graphic and violent example’ of two years of ‘increased harassment’ of U.S. diplomats in Russia”

“There could be repercussions.”

“…they didn’t need to be made on the email.”

Jun 2016

Connecting dots.

“We must protect the Secretary’s and Under Secretary’s name…”

“…disabled software on their systems intended to block phishing emails”

Lessons learned.

“Believe it or not.”

The most transparent administration ever.

“I would encourage you to also ask the State Department if there is any evidence.”

“They took something they didn’t like and pretended it didn’t happen.”

IG report puts pressure on DOJ to indict Clinton

John Sexton Jun 02, 2016 5:21 PM

“It is very harmful to her and increases the likelihood and pressure on DOJ to indict.”

May 2016

“…there was no one enforcing the rules at that time.”

What difference, at this point, does it make?